KD vs. IBM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (KD) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM).

Performance

KD vs. IBM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (KD) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KD vs. IBM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
KD Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.	-50.60%	-23.24%	66.51%	86.87%	-38.56%	-55.58%
IBM International Business Machines Corporation	-17.70%	38.23%	39.27%	21.85%	10.64%	10.79%

Fundamentals

Market Cap KD : $3.05B IBM : $230.85B
EPS KD : $1.73 IBM : $11.16
PE Ratio KD : 7.59 IBM : 21.72
PS Ratio KD : 0.21 IBM : 3.41
Total Revenue (TTM) KD : $15.12B IBM : $67.54B
Gross Profit (TTM) KD : $2.39B IBM : $39.53B
EBITDA (TTM) KD : $1.31B IBM : $16.95B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KD achieves a -50.60% return, which is significantly lower than IBM's -17.70% return.

KD

• 1D: 4.54%
• 1M: 6.41%
• YTD: -50.60%
• 6M: -56.31%
• 1Y: -58.22%
• 3Y*: -3.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBM

• 1D: 2.17%
• 1M: 0.91%
• YTD: -17.70%
• 6M: -13.13%
• 1Y: -0.10%
• 3Y*: 27.02%
• 5Y*: 18.36%
• 10Y*: 9.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

KD vs. IBM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KD

KD Risk / Return Rank: 11
KD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
KD Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
KD Omega Ratio Rank: 8
KD Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
KD Martin Ratio Rank: 9

IBM

IBM Risk / Return Rank: 41
IBM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
IBM Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
IBM Omega Ratio Rank: 36
IBM Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
IBM Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KD vs. IBM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (KD) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KD	IBM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.79	-0.00	-0.79
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.77	0.22	-0.99
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	1.03	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.77	0.06	-0.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.55	0.17	-1.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KD vs. IBM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KD Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is lower than the IBM Sharpe Ratio of -0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KD and IBM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KD	IBM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.79	-0.00	-0.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.39	0.29	-0.67

Correlation

The correlation between KD and IBM is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

KD vs. IBM - Dividend Comparison

KD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KD Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IBM International Business Machines Corporation	2.77%	2.27%	3.03%	4.05%	4.68%	4.74%	5.17%	4.80%	5.46%	3.85%	3.31%	3.63%

Drawdowns

KD vs. IBM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KD drawdown since its inception was -79.80%, which is greater than IBM's maximum drawdown of -69.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KD and IBM.

Drawdown Indicators

	KD	IBM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.80%	-69.40%	-10.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-75.60%	-28.69%	-46.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.69%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-69.80%	-22.61%	-47.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-49.48%	-20.11%	-29.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.60%	10.44%	+27.16%

Volatility

KD vs. IBM - Volatility Comparison

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (KD) has a higher volatility of 11.97% compared to International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) at 8.93%. This indicates that KD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KD	IBM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.97%	8.93%	+3.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	86.29%	27.13%	+59.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	73.43%	33.70%	+39.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.82%	24.97%	+33.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.82%	25.49%	+33.33%

Financials

KD vs. IBM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. and International Business Machines Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

KD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

IBM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a gross profit of 11.93B and revenue of 19.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.

KD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

IBM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported an operating income of 3.06B and revenue of 19.69B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.5%.

KD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 57.00M and revenue of 3.86B, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.

IBM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a net income of 5.60B and revenue of 19.69B, resulting in a net margin of 28.5%.