PortfoliosLab logo
KD vs. ET
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between KD and ET is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

KD vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (KD) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-18.67%
127.23%
KD
ET

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

KD:

1.21

ET:

0.53

Sortino Ratio

KD:

2.27

ET:

0.90

Omega Ratio

KD:

1.30

ET:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

KD:

1.25

ET:

0.59

Martin Ratio

KD:

4.23

ET:

1.97

Ulcer Index

KD:

14.51%

ET:

7.37%

Daily Std Dev

KD:

50.69%

ET:

27.18%

Max Drawdown

KD:

-79.80%

ET:

-87.81%

Current Drawdown

KD:

-23.73%

ET:

-18.58%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KD:

$7.71B

ET:

$57.20B

EPS

KD:

$0.58

ET:

$1.28

PE Ratio

KD:

57.16

ET:

13.02

PS Ratio

KD:

0.52

ET:

0.67

PB Ratio

KD:

7.13

ET:

1.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

KD:

$11.26B

ET:

$61.04B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KD:

$2.32B

ET:

$10.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

KD:

$1.16B

ET:

$11.63B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KD achieves a -4.22% return, which is significantly higher than ET's -12.38% return.


KD

YTD

-4.22%

1M

17.39%

6M

37.34%

1Y

59.56%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ET

YTD

-12.38%

1M

6.43%

6M

0.39%

1Y

12.80%

5Y*

27.39%

10Y*

1.12%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

KD vs. ET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KD is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KD is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KD is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KD is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KD is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KD is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

ET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ET is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ET is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ET is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ET is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ET is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ET is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

KD vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (KD) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current KD Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KD and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.18
0.47
KD
ET

Dividends

KD vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

KD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.61%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
KD
Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
7.61%6.51%8.96%7.33%7.44%17.28%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%2.61%

Drawdowns

KD vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KD drawdown since its inception was -79.80%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KD and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-23.73%
-18.58%
KD
ET

Volatility

KD vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (KD) has a higher volatility of 15.43% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 14.09%. This indicates that KD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
15.43%
14.09%
KD
ET

Financials

KD vs. ET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00BAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
3.74B
19.54B
(KD) Total Revenue
(ET) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KD vs. ET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. and Energy Transfer LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%AprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
20.4%
21.0%
(KD) Gross Margin
(ET) Gross Margin
KD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 763.00M and revenue of 3.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.4%.

ET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 4.10B and revenue of 19.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.0%.

KD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 116.00M and revenue of 3.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.

ET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.28B and revenue of 19.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.7%.

KD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 215.00M and revenue of 3.74B, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.

ET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.08B and revenue of 19.54B, resulting in a net margin of 5.5%.