KD vs. APPF
KD (Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.) and APPF (AppFolio, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — KD in Information Technology Services, APPF in Software - Application. Over the past 3 years, KD returned -6.13%/yr vs -4.55%/yr for APPF. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KD vs. APPF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KD achieves a -60.02% return, which is significantly lower than APPF's -37.94% return.
KD
- 1D
- -3.45%
- 1M
- -13.59%
- YTD
- -60.02%
- 6M
- -60.90%
- 1Y
- -72.42%
- 3Y*
- -6.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APPF
- 1D
- -4.70%
- 1M
- -12.45%
- YTD
- -37.94%
- 6M
- -38.88%
- 1Y
- -35.34%
- 3Y*
- -4.55%
- 5Y*
- -0.42%
- 10Y*
- 26.30%
KD vs. APPF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KD Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. | -60.02% | -23.24% | 66.51% | 86.87% | -38.56% | -63.80% |
APPF AppFolio, Inc. | -37.94% | -5.70% | 42.42% | 64.40% | -12.95% | -9.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between KD and APPF is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2021 | 0.39 |
Fundamentals
KD:
$2.42B
APPF:
$5.17B
KD:
$0.84
APPF:
$4.21
KD:
12.58
APPF:
34.32
KD:
0.17
APPF:
5.24
KD:
$15.09B
APPF:
$995.33M
KD:
$2.44B
APPF:
$629.41M
KD:
$2.02B
APPF:
$197.89M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KD vs. APPF — Risk / Return Rank
KD
APPF
KD vs. APPF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (KD) and AppFolio, Inc. (APPF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KD | APPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.73 | 0.86 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | -0.64 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.44 | -1.03 | -0.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KD vs. APPF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KD drawdown since its inception was -83.54%, which is greater than APPF's maximum drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KD and APPF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KD | APPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.54% | -55.38% | -28.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.60% | -55.38% | -20.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.63% | -55.38% | -20.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.76% | -55.06% | -23.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.64% | -18.44% | -40.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.26% | 34.38% | +15.88% |
Volatility
KD vs. APPF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (KD) is 13.33%, while AppFolio, Inc. (APPF) has a volatility of 16.50%. This indicates that KD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APPF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KD | APPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.33% | 16.50% | -3.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 88.19% | 32.11% | +56.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.39% | 43.93% | +29.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.07% | 43.24% | +15.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.07% | 44.30% | +14.77% |
Dividends
KD vs. APPF - Dividend Comparison
Neither KD nor APPF has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
KD vs. APPF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. and AppFolio, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KD vs. APPF - Profitability Comparison
KD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
APPF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AppFolio, Inc. reported a gross profit of 167.24M and revenue of 262.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.8%.
KD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
APPF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AppFolio, Inc. reported an operating income of 50.75M and revenue of 262.21M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.4%.
KD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 17.00M and revenue of 3.77B, resulting in a net margin of 0.5%.
APPF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AppFolio, Inc. reported a net income of 42.42M and revenue of 262.21M, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KD and APPF have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
APPF has higher volatility (16.50%) compared to KD (13.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KD dropped -83.54% vs APPF's -55.38%.
APPF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.81 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KD and APPF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer