PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KCE vs. COWZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KCE vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KCE achieves a -1.07% return, which is significantly lower than COWZ's 8.18% return.


KCE

1D
-1.85%
1M
-2.01%
YTD
-1.07%
6M
1.30%
1Y
10.93%
3Y*
23.82%
5Y*
11.80%
10Y*
16.37%

COWZ

1D
-0.34%
1M
2.61%
YTD
8.18%
6M
9.03%
1Y
22.23%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KCE vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KCE
SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF
-1.07%10.76%37.51%32.04%-22.14%40.05%30.82%27.13%-15.63%32.01%
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
8.18%8.98%10.64%14.73%0.19%42.57%11.65%23.41%-10.05%20.22%

Correlation

The correlation between KCE and COWZ is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2016

0.76

The correlation between KCE and COWZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KCE vs. COWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KCE
COWZ

Financial Services

98.5%

-

Technology

1.5%
16.0%

Basic Materials

-

3.7%

Communication Services

-

10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

10.9%

Energy

-

16.9%

Healthcare

-

21.8%

Industrials

-

8.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

KCE
98.5%
COWZ

-

Technology

KCE
1.5%
COWZ
16.0%

Basic Materials

KCE

-

COWZ
3.7%

Communication Services

KCE

-

COWZ
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

KCE

-

COWZ
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

KCE

-

COWZ
10.9%

Energy

KCE

-

COWZ
16.9%

Healthcare

KCE

-

COWZ
21.8%

Industrials

KCE

-

COWZ
8.4%

Real Estate

KCE

-

COWZ

-

Utilities

KCE

-

COWZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KCE vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KCE
KCE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
KCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
KCE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
KCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
KCE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

COWZ
COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KCE vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KCECOWZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.36

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

4.46

-3.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.65

12.19

-10.54

KCE vs. COWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KCE Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the COWZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KCE and COWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KCECOWZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

2.02

-1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.60

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.65

-0.39

Drawdowns

KCE vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KCE drawdown since its inception was -74.00%, which is greater than COWZ's maximum drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCE and COWZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KCECOWZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.00%

-38.63%

-35.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.44%

-5.00%

-12.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.31%

-22.00%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.45%

-22.00%

-12.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.15%

-0.91%

-7.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.81%

-4.81%

-18.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.63%

1.83%

+4.80%

Volatility

KCE vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 2.56%. This indicates that KCE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KCECOWZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

2.56%

+1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.98%

7.12%

+7.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.69%

11.13%

+8.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.01%

17.63%

+5.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.10%

19.93%

+3.17%

KCE vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

KCE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

KCE vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison

KCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than COWZ's 1.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.99%2.19%1.82%1.92%1.96%1.48%2.54%1.96%1.67%1.95%0.13%0.00%
KCE
SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF
1.75%1.63%1.56%1.82%2.42%1.53%2.20%2.32%2.67%1.95%2.30%2.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


KCE and COWZ have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KCE has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to COWZ (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KCE dropped -74.00% vs COWZ's -38.63%.

On 5-year performance, KCE leads with 11.80% vs 10.57% for COWZ. On fees, KCE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, COWZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, KCE has performed better with a 11.80% return vs 10.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KCE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for COWZ.

COWZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.75% for KCE.

KCE is categorized as Financials Equities, while COWZ is Mid Cap Value Equities. KCE tracks S&P Capital Markets Select Industry Index, while COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KCE and 0.49% for COWZ.

COWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KCE and COWZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer