KBWR vs. IAT
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco KBW Regional Banking ETF (KBWR) and iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT).
KBWR and IAT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KBWR is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the KBW Nasdaq Regional Banking Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2011. IAT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Regional Banks Index. It was launched on May 5, 2006. Both KBWR and IAT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KBWR or IAT.
Correlation
The correlation between KBWR and IAT is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
KBWR vs. IAT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
KBWR:
0.82
IAT:
1.45
KBWR:
1.44
IAT:
2.22
KBWR:
1.17
IAT:
1.27
KBWR:
0.86
IAT:
0.93
KBWR:
3.01
IAT:
7.08
KBWR:
8.27%
IAT:
5.18%
KBWR:
30.21%
IAT:
25.31%
KBWR:
-52.86%
IAT:
-77.22%
KBWR:
-8.48%
IAT:
-15.55%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KBWR achieves a 3.81% return, which is significantly lower than IAT's 4.88% return. Over the past 10 years, KBWR has outperformed IAT with an annualized return of 8.28%, while IAT has yielded a comparatively lower 7.67% annualized return.
KBWR
3.81%
4.32%
11.74%
23.60%
6.04%
8.28%
IAT
4.88%
5.01%
14.40%
32.28%
4.63%
7.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KBWR vs. IAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
KBWR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IAT's 0.42% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KBWR vs. IAT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
KBWR
IAT
KBWR vs. IAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW Regional Banking ETF (KBWR) and iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KBWR vs. IAT - Dividend Comparison
KBWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than IAT's 2.82% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBWR Invesco KBW Regional Banking ETF | 2.60% | 2.69% | 2.89% | 2.51% | 2.04% | 2.92% | 2.44% | 2.45% | 1.59% | 1.50% | 1.92% | 1.79% |
IAT iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF | 2.82% | 2.96% | 3.56% | 3.12% | 1.88% | 2.87% | 2.49% | 2.48% | 1.56% | 1.52% | 1.78% | 1.68% |
Drawdowns
KBWR vs. IAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KBWR drawdown since its inception was -52.86%, smaller than the maximum IAT drawdown of -77.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWR and IAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KBWR vs. IAT - Volatility Comparison
Invesco KBW Regional Banking ETF (KBWR) has a higher volatility of 9.19% compared to iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) at 8.14%. This indicates that KBWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.