PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBWD vs. COWZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBWD vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF (KBWD) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBWD achieves a -5.52% return, which is significantly lower than COWZ's 8.18% return.


KBWD

1D
-2.44%
1M
-7.64%
YTD
-5.52%
6M
-6.05%
1Y
2.58%
3Y*
6.15%
5Y*
0.13%
10Y*
4.82%

COWZ

1D
-0.34%
1M
2.61%
YTD
8.18%
6M
9.03%
1Y
22.23%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBWD vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KBWD
Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF
-5.52%5.59%4.30%20.21%-19.14%31.89%-15.58%20.72%-8.70%12.06%
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
8.18%8.98%10.64%14.73%0.19%42.57%11.65%23.41%-10.05%20.22%

Correlation

The correlation between KBWD and COWZ is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2016

0.72

The correlation between KBWD and COWZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KBWD vs. COWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KBWD
COWZ

Financial Services

60.9%

-

Real Estate

39.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

3.7%

Communication Services

-

10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

10.9%

Energy

-

16.9%

Healthcare

-

21.8%

Industrials

-

8.4%

Technology

-

16.0%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

KBWD
60.9%
COWZ

-

Real Estate

KBWD
39.1%
COWZ

-

Basic Materials

KBWD

-

COWZ
3.7%

Communication Services

KBWD

-

COWZ
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

KBWD

-

COWZ
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

KBWD

-

COWZ
10.9%

Energy

KBWD

-

COWZ
16.9%

Healthcare

KBWD

-

COWZ
21.8%

Industrials

KBWD

-

COWZ
8.4%

Technology

KBWD

-

COWZ
16.0%

Utilities

KBWD

-

COWZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBWD vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBWD
KBWD Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
KBWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBWD Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
KBWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBWD Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

COWZ
COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBWD vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF (KBWD) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KBWDCOWZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.17

2.02

-1.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.34

2.98

-2.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.36

-0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

4.46

-4.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.45

12.19

-11.75

KBWD vs. COWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBWD Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the COWZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBWD and COWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KBWDCOWZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

2.02

-1.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.60

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.65

-0.38

Drawdowns

KBWD vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBWD drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, which is greater than COWZ's maximum drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWD and COWZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBWDCOWZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.63%

-38.63%

-20.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.05%

-5.00%

-10.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.65%

-22.00%

+2.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.74%

-22.00%

-8.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.23%

-0.91%

-11.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.41%

-4.81%

-2.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.80%

1.83%

+3.97%

Volatility

KBWD vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF (KBWD) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 2.56%. This indicates that KBWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBWDCOWZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

2.56%

+1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.09%

7.12%

+4.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.41%

11.13%

+4.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.85%

17.63%

+2.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.24%

19.93%

+3.31%

KBWD vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBWD has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

KBWD vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison

KBWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.40%, more than COWZ's 1.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.99%2.19%1.82%1.92%1.96%1.48%2.54%1.96%1.67%1.95%0.13%0.00%
KBWD
Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF
14.40%12.83%12.45%11.45%11.32%7.26%9.68%8.63%9.47%8.77%8.68%8.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


KBWD and COWZ have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KBWD has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to COWZ (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBWD dropped -58.63% vs COWZ's -38.63%.

On 5-year performance, COWZ leads with 10.57% vs 0.13% for KBWD. On fees, COWZ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, COWZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, COWZ has performed better with a 10.57% return vs 0.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COWZ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for KBWD.

KBWD has the higher dividend yield at 14.40%, compared with 1.99% for COWZ.

KBWD is categorized as Financials Equities, while COWZ is Mid Cap Value Equities. KBWD tracks KBW Nasdaq Financial Sector Dividend Yield Index, while COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for KBWD and 0.49% for COWZ.

COWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBWD and COWZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer