PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBWB vs. USRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBWB vs. USRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) and iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBWB achieves a 4.07% return, which is significantly lower than USRT's 12.59% return. Over the past 10 years, KBWB has outperformed USRT with an annualized return of 12.09%, while USRT has yielded a comparatively lower 6.21% annualized return.


KBWB

1D
-1.39%
1M
2.14%
YTD
4.07%
6M
8.58%
1Y
34.45%
3Y*
31.93%
5Y*
7.75%
10Y*
12.09%

USRT

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
12.59%
6M
11.36%
1Y
15.26%
3Y*
11.53%
5Y*
4.73%
10Y*
6.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBWB vs. USRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KBWB
Invesco KBW Bank ETF
4.07%32.05%36.73%-1.18%-21.68%37.72%-10.46%35.90%-18.30%18.11%
USRT
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF
12.59%2.44%8.58%13.64%-24.43%43.26%-8.06%25.98%-4.67%5.27%

Correlation

The correlation between KBWB and USRT is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2011

0.42

The correlation between KBWB and USRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KBWB vs. USRT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KBWB
USRT

Financial Services

100.0%
0.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

99.4%

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

KBWB
100.0%
USRT
0.1%

Basic Materials

KBWB

-

USRT

-

Communication Services

KBWB

-

USRT

-

Consumer Cyclical

KBWB

-

USRT

-

Consumer Defensive

KBWB

-

USRT

-

Energy

KBWB

-

USRT

-

Healthcare

KBWB

-

USRT

-

Industrials

KBWB

-

USRT

-

Real Estate

KBWB

-

USRT
99.4%

Technology

KBWB

-

USRT

-

Utilities

KBWB

-

USRT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBWB vs. USRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBWB
KBWB Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
KBWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBWB Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
KBWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBWB Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

USRT
USRT Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
USRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
USRT Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
USRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
USRT Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBWB vs. USRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) and iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KBWBUSRTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.73

1.15

+0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.28

1.63

+0.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.20

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

1.91

+0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.64

6.15

+0.49

KBWB vs. USRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBWB Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the USRT Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBWB and USRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KBWBUSRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

1.15

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.25

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.29

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.18

+0.31

Drawdowns

KBWB vs. USRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBWB drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, smaller than the maximum USRT drawdown of -69.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWB and USRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBWBUSRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.27%

-69.91%

+19.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.38%

-8.04%

-8.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.43%

-18.70%

-6.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.31%

-31.03%

-18.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.27%

-44.38%

-5.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.29%

-3.01%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.74%

-12.97%

+1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.20%

2.49%

+2.71%

Volatility

KBWB vs. USRT - Volatility Comparison

Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) at 3.92%. This indicates that KBWB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBWBUSRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

3.92%

+1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.49%

9.25%

+6.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.06%

13.28%

+6.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.63%

18.89%

+7.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.20%

21.28%

+7.92%

KBWB vs. USRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBWB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than USRT's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

KBWB vs. USRT - Dividend Comparison

KBWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than USRT's 2.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KBWB
Invesco KBW Bank ETF
2.06%2.04%2.46%3.20%3.05%2.13%2.62%2.38%2.54%1.35%1.53%1.53%
USRT
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF
2.67%3.07%2.85%3.18%3.46%2.27%3.12%3.34%5.66%3.44%3.98%3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


KBWB and USRT have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KBWB has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to USRT (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBWB dropped -50.27% vs USRT's -69.91%.

On 10-year performance, KBWB leads with 12.09% vs 6.21% for USRT. On fees, USRT is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, USRT has been the lower-risk option at 3.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, KBWB has performed better with a 12.09% return vs 6.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USRT is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for KBWB.

USRT has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 2.06% for KBWB.

KBWB is categorized as Financials Equities, while USRT is REIT. KBWB tracks KBW Nasdaq Bank Index, while USRT tracks FTSE NAREIT Equity REITs Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KBWB and 0.08% for USRT.

KBWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBWB and USRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer