PortfoliosLab logo
KBUY vs. CHIQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between KBUY and CHIQ is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

KBUY vs. CHIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares CICC China Consumer Leaders Index ETF (KBUY) and Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


KBUY

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CHIQ

YTD

10.22%

1M

0.92%

6M

9.63%

1Y

18.04%

3Y*

2.56%

5Y*

3.46%

10Y*

4.49%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KBUY vs. CHIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBUY has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than CHIQ's 0.65% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

KBUY vs. CHIQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBUY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KBUY is 22
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KBUY is 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KBUY is 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KBUY is 11
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KBUY is 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KBUY is 33
Martin Ratio Rank

CHIQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CHIQ is 3939
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CHIQ is 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CHIQ is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CHIQ is 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CHIQ is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CHIQ is 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

KBUY vs. CHIQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares CICC China Consumer Leaders Index ETF (KBUY) and Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

KBUY vs. CHIQ - Dividend Comparison

KBUY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
KBUY
KraneShares CICC China Consumer Leaders Index ETF
0.00%0.00%1.91%1.04%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CHIQ
Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF
2.41%2.66%2.26%0.38%0.00%0.11%1.04%2.71%0.62%1.51%4.86%2.08%

Drawdowns

KBUY vs. CHIQ - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

KBUY vs. CHIQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...