PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBR vs. XLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KBR vs. XLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KBR, Inc. (KBR) and Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KBR vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KBR
KBR, Inc.
-6.25%-29.66%5.58%5.94%11.93%55.64%3.23%103.61%-22.05%21.16%
XLU
Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund
8.77%16.03%23.31%-7.18%1.44%17.70%0.51%25.93%3.94%12.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBR achieves a -6.25% return, which is significantly lower than XLU's 8.77% return. Over the past 10 years, KBR has outperformed XLU with an annualized return of 11.03%, while XLU has yielded a comparatively lower 9.79% annualized return.


KBR

1D
1.79%
1M
-9.29%
YTD
-6.25%
6M
-20.80%
1Y
-23.74%
3Y*
-10.97%
5Y*
1.28%
10Y*
11.03%

XLU

1D
0.48%
1M
-1.98%
YTD
8.77%
6M
6.26%
1Y
19.98%
3Y*
14.30%
5Y*
10.90%
10Y*
9.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBR vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBR
KBR Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
KBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBR Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
KBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBR Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

XLU
XLU Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBR vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KBR, Inc. (KBR) and Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KBRXLUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.73

1.27

-2.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.92

1.73

-2.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.23

-0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.67

2.21

-2.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.22

5.31

-6.53

KBR vs. XLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBR Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the XLU Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBR and XLU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KBRXLUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.73

1.27

-2.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.64

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.51

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.41

-0.30

Correlation

The correlation between KBR and XLU is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

KBR vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison

KBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than XLU's 2.58% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KBR
KBR, Inc.
1.76%1.64%1.04%0.97%0.91%0.92%1.29%1.05%2.11%1.61%1.92%1.89%
XLU
Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund
2.58%2.71%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%

Drawdowns

KBR vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBR drawdown since its inception was -77.47%, which is greater than XLU's maximum drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBR and XLU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KBRXLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.47%

-51.98%

-25.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.24%

-9.18%

-26.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.24%

-25.26%

-23.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.94%

-36.07%

-21.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.82%

-2.72%

-44.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.79%

-10.26%

-23.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.25%

3.82%

+15.43%

Volatility

KBR vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison

KBR, Inc. (KBR) has a higher volatility of 7.82% compared to Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU) at 5.09%. This indicates that KBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KBRXLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.82%

5.09%

+2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.43%

10.36%

+12.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.68%

15.79%

+16.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.84%

17.18%

+10.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.67%

19.21%

+17.46%