PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBR vs. PWR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KBR vs. PWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KBR, Inc. (KBR) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBR achieves a -10.74% return, which is significantly lower than PWR's 67.37% return. Over the past 10 years, KBR has underperformed PWR with an annualized return of 10.66%, while PWR has yielded a comparatively higher 40.74% annualized return.


KBR

1D
0.20%
1M
-4.62%
YTD
-10.74%
6M
-17.54%
1Y
-29.05%
3Y*
-15.66%
5Y*
-1.42%
10Y*
10.66%

PWR

1D
2.70%
1M
-4.87%
YTD
67.37%
6M
55.34%
1Y
104.54%
3Y*
57.89%
5Y*
50.10%
10Y*
40.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBR vs. PWR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KBR
KBR, Inc.
-10.74%-29.66%5.58%5.94%11.93%55.64%3.23%103.61%-22.05%21.16%
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc.
67.37%33.70%46.60%51.70%24.63%59.50%77.74%35.84%-22.93%12.22%

Correlation

The correlation between KBR and PWR is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2006

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between KBR and PWR has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KBR:

$4.54B

PWR:

$107.38B

EPS

KBR:

$3.11

PWR:

$7.29

PE Ratio

KBR:

11.49

PWR:

96.85

PEG Ratio

KBR:

0.07

PWR:

4.80

PS Ratio

KBR:

0.60

PWR:

3.57

PB Ratio

KBR:

2.86

PWR:

11.87

Total Revenue (TTM)

KBR:

$7.69B

PWR:

$29.99B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KBR:

$1.12B

PWR:

$4.08B

EBITDA (TTM)

KBR:

$883.00M

PWR:

$2.40B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBR vs. PWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBR
KBR Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
KBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
KBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBR Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

PWR
PWR Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
PWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWR Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBR vs. PWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KBR, Inc. (KBR) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KBRPWRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.92

2.90

-3.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.24

3.60

-4.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.48

-0.63

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.71

8.54

-9.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.43

21.30

-22.73

KBR vs. PWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBR Sharpe Ratio is -0.92, which is lower than the PWR Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBR and PWR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KBRPWRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.92

2.90

-3.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

1.42

-1.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

1.21

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.35

-0.25

Drawdowns

KBR vs. PWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBR drawdown since its inception was -77.47%, smaller than the maximum PWR drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBR and PWR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBRPWRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.47%

-97.07%

+19.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.18%

-12.45%

-30.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.39%

-33.89%

-23.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.39%

-33.89%

-23.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.94%

-45.53%

-12.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.37%

-10.08%

-39.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.93%

-46.88%

+12.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.32%

4.99%

+16.33%

Volatility

KBR vs. PWR - Volatility Comparison

KBR, Inc. (KBR) has a higher volatility of 15.37% compared to Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) at 12.01%. This indicates that KBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBRPWRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.37%

12.01%

+3.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.18%

29.55%

-4.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.75%

36.22%

-4.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.58%

35.60%

-7.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.84%

33.69%

+3.15%

Dividends

KBR vs. PWR - Dividend Comparison

KBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than PWR's 0.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KBR
KBR, Inc.
1.85%1.64%1.04%0.97%0.91%0.92%1.29%1.05%2.11%1.61%1.92%1.89%
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc.
0.06%0.09%0.09%0.15%0.25%0.16%0.29%0.42%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

KBR vs. PWR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between KBR, Inc. and Quanta Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
1.92B
7.87B
(KBR) Total Revenue
(PWR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KBR vs. PWR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between KBR, Inc. and Quanta Services, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%11.0%12.0%13.0%14.0%15.0%20222023202420252026
13.8%
14.1%
Portfolio components
KBR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KBR, Inc. reported a gross profit of 265.00M and revenue of 1.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.8%.

PWR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.11B and revenue of 7.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.1%.

KBR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KBR, Inc. reported an operating income of 180.00M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

PWR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 338.78M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.

KBR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KBR, Inc. reported a net income of 102.00M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.

PWR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 220.63M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KBR and PWR have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KBR has higher volatility (15.37%) compared to PWR (12.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBR dropped -77.47% vs PWR's -97.07%.

PWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBR and PWR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer