PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBR vs. GGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KBR vs. GGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KBR, Inc. (KBR) and Graco Inc. (GGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBR achieves a -10.72% return, which is significantly lower than GGG's -9.37% return. Over the past 10 years, KBR has underperformed GGG with an annualized return of 10.66%, while GGG has yielded a comparatively higher 12.00% annualized return.


KBR

1D
0.03%
1M
-7.60%
YTD
-10.72%
6M
-17.69%
1Y
-30.26%
3Y*
-15.65%
5Y*
-1.28%
10Y*
10.66%

GGG

1D
-0.35%
1M
-5.26%
YTD
-9.37%
6M
-10.48%
1Y
-11.42%
3Y*
-1.34%
5Y*
0.83%
10Y*
12.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBR vs. GGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KBR
KBR, Inc.
-10.72%-29.66%5.58%5.94%11.93%55.64%3.23%103.61%-22.05%21.16%
GGG
Graco Inc.
-9.37%-1.46%-1.68%30.62%-15.48%12.56%40.97%25.94%-6.34%65.60%

Correlation

The correlation between KBR and GGG is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2006

0.52

The correlation between KBR and GGG shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

KBR:

$3.11

GGG:

$4.09

PE Ratio

KBR:

11.49

GGG:

18.06

PEG Ratio

KBR:

0.07

GGG:

3.55

PS Ratio

KBR:

0.60

GGG:

4.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

KBR:

$7.69B

GGG:

$2.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KBR:

$1.12B

GGG:

$1.18B

EBITDA (TTM)

KBR:

$883.00M

GGG:

$712.41M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBR vs. GGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBR
KBR Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
KBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBR Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
KBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBR Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

GGG
GGG Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
GGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGG Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
GGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGG Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBR vs. GGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KBR, Inc. (KBR) and Graco Inc. (GGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KBRGGGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

0.91

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.70

-0.52

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.41

-1.40

-0.01

KBR vs. GGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBR Sharpe Ratio is -0.96, which is lower than the GGG Sharpe Ratio of -0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBR and GGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KBRGGGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.96

-0.60

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.04

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.49

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.43

-0.33

Drawdowns

KBR vs. GGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBR drawdown since its inception was -77.47%, which is greater than GGG's maximum drawdown of -68.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBR and GGG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBRGGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.47%

-68.77%

-8.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.18%

-21.92%

-21.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.39%

-21.92%

-35.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.39%

-28.98%

-28.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.94%

-30.60%

-27.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.36%

-21.92%

-27.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.93%

-12.10%

-21.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.41%

8.16%

+13.25%

Volatility

KBR vs. GGG - Volatility Comparison

KBR, Inc. (KBR) has a higher volatility of 14.95% compared to Graco Inc. (GGG) at 4.52%. This indicates that KBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBRGGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.95%

4.52%

+10.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.14%

14.17%

+10.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.69%

19.00%

+12.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.57%

22.63%

+5.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.83%

24.76%

+12.07%

Dividends

KBR vs. GGG - Dividend Comparison

KBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than GGG's 1.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GGG
Graco Inc.
1.54%1.34%1.21%1.08%1.25%0.93%0.97%1.23%1.27%1.06%1.59%1.67%
KBR
KBR, Inc.
1.85%1.64%1.04%0.97%0.91%0.92%1.29%1.05%2.11%1.61%1.92%1.89%

Financials

KBR vs. GGG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between KBR, Inc. and Graco Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
1.92B
540.14M
(KBR) Total Revenue
(GGG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KBR vs. GGG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between KBR, Inc. and Graco Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
13.8%
52.0%
Portfolio components
KBR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KBR, Inc. reported a gross profit of 265.00M and revenue of 1.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.8%.

GGG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graco Inc. reported a gross profit of 280.64M and revenue of 540.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.0%.

KBR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KBR, Inc. reported an operating income of 180.00M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

GGG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graco Inc. reported an operating income of 137.78M and revenue of 540.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.5%.

KBR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KBR, Inc. reported a net income of 102.00M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.

GGG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graco Inc. reported a net income of 118.51M and revenue of 540.14M, resulting in a net margin of 21.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KBR and GGG have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KBR has higher volatility (14.95%) compared to GGG (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBR dropped -77.47% vs GGG's -68.77%.

GGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.60 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBR and GGG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer