KBGGY vs. NVO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

KBGGY (Kongsberg Gruppen ASA) and NVO (Novo Nordisk A/S) are both stocks. KBGGY operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while NVO operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 3 years, KBGGY returned 71.26%/yr vs -16.12%/yr for NVO. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

KBGGY vs. NVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kongsberg Gruppen ASA (KBGGY) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBGGY achieves a 59.52% return, which is significantly higher than NVO's -12.70% return.

KBGGY

• 1D: -2.65%
• 1M: 6.87%
• YTD: 59.52%
• 6M: 72.82%
• 1Y: 12.16%
• 3Y*: 71.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVO

• 1D: -2.61%
• 1M: -2.19%
• YTD: -12.70%
• 6M: -6.35%
• 1Y: -38.32%
• 3Y*: -16.12%
• 5Y*: 3.67%
• 10Y*: 6.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBGGY vs. NVO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
KBGGY Kongsberg Gruppen ASA	59.52%	19.00%	164.60%	-2.54%
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S	-12.70%	-39.22%	-15.93%	21.90%

Correlation

The correlation between KBGGY and NVO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2023	0.13

Return for Risk

KBGGY vs. NVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBGGY

KBGGY Risk / Return Rank: 47
KBGGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
KBGGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
KBGGY Omega Ratio Rank: 52
KBGGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
KBGGY Martin Ratio Rank: 43

NVO

NVO Risk / Return Rank: 14
NVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
NVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
NVO Omega Ratio Rank: 11
NVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
NVO Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBGGY vs. NVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kongsberg Gruppen ASA (KBGGY) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KBGGY	NVO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	-0.74	+0.90
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.84	-0.85	+1.68
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	0.88	+0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.22	-0.68	+0.89
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.28	-1.01	+1.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KBGGY vs. NVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBGGY Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is higher than the NVO Sharpe Ratio of -0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBGGY and NVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KBGGY	NVO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16	-0.74	+0.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.10	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.20	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.12	0.47	+0.65

Drawdowns

KBGGY vs. NVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBGGY drawdown since its inception was -68.35%, smaller than the maximum NVO drawdown of -74.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBGGY and NVO.

Drawdown Indicators

	KBGGY	NVO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.35%	-74.70%	+6.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-68.35%	-55.03%	-13.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-68.35%	-74.70%	+6.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-74.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-74.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.83%	-68.81%	+25.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.00%	-17.75%	-2.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	53.32%	36.77%	+16.55%

Volatility

KBGGY vs. NVO - Volatility Comparison

Kongsberg Gruppen ASA (KBGGY) has a higher volatility of 15.41% compared to Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) at 7.70%. This indicates that KBGGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KBGGY	NVO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.41%	7.70%	+7.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.99%	37.81%	+0.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	77.45%	51.76%	+25.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.73%	38.20%	+23.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.73%	32.49%	+29.24%

Dividends

KBGGY vs. NVO - Dividend Comparison

KBGGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.83%, more than NVO's 4.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KBGGY Kongsberg Gruppen ASA	23.83%	5.82%	1.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S	4.20%	3.31%	1.68%	1.00%	1.20%	1.35%	1.87%	2.14%	1.45%	1.52%	2.87%	0.92%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KBGGY and NVO in my portfolio?

KBGGY and NVO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KBGGY or NVO?

KBGGY has higher volatility (15.41%) compared to NVO (7.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBGGY dropped -68.35% vs NVO's -74.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KBGGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.16 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.