KBGGY vs. CTAS
KBGGY (Kongsberg Gruppen ASA) and CTAS (Cintas Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — KBGGY in Aerospace & Defense, CTAS in Specialty Business Services. Over the past 3 years, KBGGY returned 66.90%/yr vs 18.61%/yr for CTAS. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
KBGGY vs. CTAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KBGGY achieves a 47.65% return, which is significantly higher than CTAS's 9.35% return.
KBGGY
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- -4.22%
- 6M
- 10.97%
- YTD
- 47.65%
- 1Y
- 32.00%
- 3Y*
- 66.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 60.33%
CTAS
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 12.82%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- YTD
- 9.35%
- 1Y
- -6.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.61%
- 5Y*
- 16.82%
- 10Y*
- 23.95%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $538.80M | $519.54M | $423.07M | |
| $1.50M | $1.28M | $1.13M |
KBGGY vs. CTAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
KBGGY Kongsberg Gruppen ASA | 47.65% | 19.00% | 164.60% | -2.54% |
CTAS Cintas Corporation | 9.35% | 3.78% | 22.24% | 28.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between KBGGY and CTAS is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023 | 0.07 |
Fundamentals
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KBGGY vs. CTAS — Risk / Return Rank
KBGGY
CTAS
KBGGY vs. CTAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kongsberg Gruppen ASA (KBGGY) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KBGGY | CTAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.97 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | -0.26 | +1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.12 | -0.43 | +2.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KBGGY vs. CTAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KBGGY drawdown since its inception was -68.35%, roughly equal to the maximum CTAS drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBGGY and CTAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KBGGY | CTAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.35% | -65.32% | -3.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.28% | -27.23% | -4.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.35% | -27.68% | -40.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.09% | -9.26% | -37.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.42% | -15.05% | -6.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.18% | 16.90% | -2.72% |
Volatility
KBGGY vs. CTAS - Volatility Comparison
Kongsberg Gruppen ASA (KBGGY) has a higher volatility of 13.25% compared to Cintas Corporation (CTAS) at 11.44%. This indicates that KBGGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KBGGY | CTAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.25% | 11.44% | +1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.39% | 19.68% | +17.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.07% | 23.28% | +27.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.92% | 23.01% | +37.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.92% | 26.79% | +34.13% |
Dividends
KBGGY vs. CTAS - Dividend Comparison
KBGGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.74%, more than CTAS's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTAS Cintas Corporation | 0.88% | 0.89% | 0.80% | 0.83% | 0.93% | 0.77% | 0.99% | 0.95% | 1.22% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.15% |
KBGGY Kongsberg Gruppen ASA | 25.74% | 5.82% | 1.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
KBGGY vs. CTAS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kongsberg Gruppen ASA and Cintas Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
KBGGY and CTAS have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KBGGY has higher volatility (13.25%) compared to CTAS (11.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBGGY dropped -68.35% vs CTAS's -65.32%.
KBGGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KBGGY and CTAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer