PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KB vs. KT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KB vs. KT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KB Financial Group Inc. (KB) and KT Corporation (KT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KB achieves a 38.21% return, which is significantly higher than KT's -3.83% return. Over the past 10 years, KB has outperformed KT with an annualized return of 17.67%, while KT has yielded a comparatively lower 4.57% annualized return.


KB

1D
-2.70%
1M
7.75%
6M
26.55%
YTD
38.21%
1Y
55.39%
3Y*
47.75%
5Y*
27.20%
10Y*
17.67%
ALL TIME*
7.90%

KT

1D
-2.11%
1M
2.26%
6M
-12.79%
YTD
-3.83%
1Y
-9.48%
3Y*
20.09%
5Y*
10.17%
10Y*
4.57%
ALL TIME*
0.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$35.97M$37.12M$31.41M
$25.80M$25.29M$29.71M

KB vs. KT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KB
KB Financial Group Inc.
38.21%56.57%45.22%10.35%-11.26%22.62%-0.46%-1.45%-28.25%65.80%
KT
KT Corporation
-3.83%27.73%19.93%5.01%13.34%21.00%-5.09%-18.42%-8.90%10.79%

Correlation

The correlation between KB and KT is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2001

0.43

The correlation between KB and KT shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KB:

$41.37B

KT:

$8.72B

EPS

KB:

₩16.30K

KT:

₩3.09K

PE Ratio

KB:

10.35

KT:

8.37

PEG Ratio

KB:

1.15

KT:

0.18

PS Ratio

KB:

1.44

KT:

0.47

PB Ratio

KB:

1.17

KT:

0.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

KB:

₩43.88T

KT:

₩28.39T

Gross Profit (TTM)

KB:

₩22.91T

KT:

₩15.90T

EBITDA (TTM)

KB:

₩9.39T

KT:

₩5.41T

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KB vs. KT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KB
KB Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
KB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
KB Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
KB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
KB Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

KT
KT Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
KT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
KT Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
KT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
KT Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KB vs. KT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KB Financial Group Inc. (KB) and KT Corporation (KT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KBKTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.96

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

-0.30

+3.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.11

-0.62

+7.72

KB vs. KT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KB Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the KT Sharpe Ratio of -0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KB and KT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KB vs. KT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KB drawdown since its inception was -84.27%, roughly equal to the maximum KT drawdown of -85.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KB and KT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBKTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.27%

-85.64%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.74%

-29.07%

+12.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.41%

-29.07%

-5.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.89%

-29.07%

-13.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.92%

-64.03%

-2.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.41%

-49.88%

+45.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.95%

-65.81%

+25.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.41%

14.05%

-6.64%

Volatility

KB vs. KT - Volatility Comparison

KB Financial Group Inc. (KB) has a higher volatility of 15.21% compared to KT Corporation (KT) at 8.69%. This indicates that KB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBKTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.21%

8.69%

+6.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.80%

18.34%

+11.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.82%

22.87%

+13.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.30%

22.81%

+11.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.11%

23.44%

+9.67%

Dividends

KB vs. KT - Dividend Comparison

KB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than KT's 2.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KB
KB Financial Group Inc.
2.02%2.92%4.98%2.81%5.78%5.27%3.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.10%3.05%
KT
KT Corporation
2.25%4.24%3.50%5.29%5.40%6.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.49%1.84%

Financials

KB vs. KT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between KB Financial Group Inc. and KT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

KB vs. KT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between KB Financial Group Inc. and KT Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

KB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, KB Financial Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.71T and revenue of 2.71T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

KT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, KT Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.28T and revenue of 6.98T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.

KB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, KB Financial Group Inc. reported an operating income of 2.71T and revenue of 2.71T, resulting in an operating margin of 100.0%.

KT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, KT Corporation reported an operating income of 492.09B and revenue of 6.98T, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.

KB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, KB Financial Group Inc. reported a net income of 1.97T and revenue of 2.71T, resulting in a net margin of 72.8%.

KT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, KT Corporation reported a net income of 399.91B and revenue of 6.98T, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KB and KT have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KB has higher volatility (15.21%) compared to KT (8.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KB dropped -84.27% vs KT's -85.64%.

KB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KB and KT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer