KB vs. KEP
KB (KB Financial Group Inc.) and KEP (Korea Electric Power Corporation) are both stocks. KB operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while KEP operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, KB returned 17.76%/yr vs -5.68%/yr for KEP. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KB vs. KEP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KB achieves a 24.24% return, which is significantly higher than KEP's -23.27% return. Over the past 10 years, KB has outperformed KEP with an annualized return of 17.76%, while KEP has yielded a comparatively lower -5.68% annualized return.
KB
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- YTD
- 24.24%
- 6M
- 25.23%
- 1Y
- 38.19%
- 3Y*
- 49.57%
- 5Y*
- 22.43%
- 10Y*
- 17.76%
KEP
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- -3.28%
- YTD
- -23.27%
- 6M
- -21.37%
- 1Y
- 21.91%
- 3Y*
- 23.88%
- 5Y*
- 4.29%
- 10Y*
- -5.68%
KB vs. KEP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KB KB Financial Group Inc. | 24.24% | 56.57% | 45.22% | 10.35% | -11.26% | 22.62% | -0.46% | -1.45% | -28.25% | 65.80% |
KEP Korea Electric Power Corporation | -23.27% | 147.56% | -4.05% | -16.09% | -5.47% | -25.51% | 3.72% | -19.80% | -16.71% | -4.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between KB and KEP is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2001 | 0.44 |
The correlation between KB and KEP shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (3 years) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
KB:
$39.99B
KEP:
$16.42B
KB:
₩16.37K
KEP:
₩6.83K
KB:
9.92
KEP:
2.84
KB:
1.10
KEP:
0.06
KB:
1.38
KEP:
0.26
KB:
1.12
KEP:
0.51
KB:
₩43.88T
KEP:
₩97.47T
KB:
₩22.91T
KEP:
₩16.07T
KB:
₩9.39T
KEP:
₩29.23T
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KB vs. KEP — Risk / Return Rank
KB
KEP
KB vs. KEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KB Financial Group Inc. (KB) and Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KB | KEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.12 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 0.45 | +1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.54 | 1.00 | +3.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KB vs. KEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KB drawdown since its inception was -84.27%, which is greater than KEP's maximum drawdown of -78.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KB and KEP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KB | KEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.27% | -78.55% | -5.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.74% | -48.84% | +32.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.41% | -48.84% | +14.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.89% | -48.84% | +5.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.92% | -78.55% | +11.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.57% | -51.13% | +41.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.11% | -44.51% | +4.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.44% | 21.87% | -13.43% |
Volatility
KB vs. KEP - Volatility Comparison
KB Financial Group Inc. (KB) has a higher volatility of 14.09% compared to Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEP) at 12.87%. This indicates that KB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KB | KEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.09% | 12.87% | +1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.00% | 38.54% | -11.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.61% | 53.86% | -17.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.69% | 38.21% | -4.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.90% | 35.48% | -2.58% |
Dividends
KB vs. KEP - Dividend Comparison
KB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than KEP's 4.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KB KB Financial Group Inc. | 2.25% | 2.92% | 4.98% | 2.81% | 5.78% | 5.27% | 3.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.10% | 3.05% |
KEP Korea Electric Power Corporation | 4.12% | 3.16% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.68% | 6.46% |
Financials
KB vs. KEP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between KB Financial Group Inc. and Korea Electric Power Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KB vs. KEP - Profitability Comparison
KB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KB Financial Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.71T and revenue of 2.71T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
KEP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Korea Electric Power Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.68T and revenue of 25.13T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.6%.
KB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KB Financial Group Inc. reported an operating income of 2.71T and revenue of 2.71T, resulting in an operating margin of 100.0%.
KEP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Korea Electric Power Corporation reported an operating income of 3.93T and revenue of 25.13T, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.
KB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KB Financial Group Inc. reported a net income of 1.97T and revenue of 2.71T, resulting in a net margin of 72.8%.
KEP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Korea Electric Power Corporation reported a net income of 2.59T and revenue of 25.13T, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KB and KEP have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KB has higher volatility (14.09%) compared to KEP (12.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KB dropped -84.27% vs KEP's -78.55%.
KB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KB and KEP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer