KB vs. HUBB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about KB Financial Group Inc. (KB) and Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB).

Performance

KB vs. HUBB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KB Financial Group Inc. (KB) and Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KB vs. HUBB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KB KB Financial Group Inc.	15.91%	56.57%	45.22%	10.35%	-11.26%	22.62%	-0.46%	-1.45%	-28.25%	65.80%
HUBB Hubbell Incorporated	10.80%	7.43%	28.94%	42.40%	15.08%	35.60%	8.89%	52.88%	-24.61%	18.83%

Fundamentals

Market Cap KB : $38.12B HUBB : $26.29B
EPS KB : $15.68K HUBB : $16.64
PE Ratio KB : 0.01 HUBB : 29.50
PEG Ratio KB : 0.00 HUBB : 1.22
PS Ratio KB : 0.00 HUBB : 4.51
PB Ratio KB : 0.00 HUBB : 6.81
Total Revenue (TTM) KB : $50.69T HUBB : $5.84B
Gross Profit (TTM) KB : $24.86T HUBB : $2.07B
EBITDA (TTM) KB : $9.21T HUBB : $1.34B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KB achieves a 15.91% return, which is significantly higher than HUBB's 10.80% return. Over the past 10 years, KB has underperformed HUBB with an annualized return of 17.08%, while HUBB has yielded a comparatively higher 18.77% annualized return.

KB

• 1D: 2.27%
• 1M: -9.34%
• YTD: 15.91%
• 6M: 21.13%
• 1Y: 88.97%
• 3Y*: 45.10%
• 5Y*: 20.99%
• 10Y*: 17.08%

HUBB

• 1D: 3.95%
• 1M: -4.08%
• YTD: 10.80%
• 6M: 14.73%
• 1Y: 50.14%
• 3Y*: 28.03%
• 5Y*: 22.81%
• 10Y*: 18.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

KB vs. HUBB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KB

KB Risk / Return Rank: 92
KB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
KB Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
KB Omega Ratio Rank: 91
KB Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
KB Martin Ratio Rank: 92

HUBB

HUBB Risk / Return Rank: 86
HUBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
HUBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
HUBB Omega Ratio Rank: 81
HUBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
HUBB Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KB vs. HUBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KB Financial Group Inc. (KB) and Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KB	HUBB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	1.61	+0.74
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	2.32	+0.72
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.29	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.24	3.60	+1.64
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.41	10.68	+1.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KB vs. HUBB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KB Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the HUBB Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KB and HUBB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KB	HUBB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35	1.61	+0.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.80	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	0.66	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.67	-0.49

Correlation

The correlation between KB and HUBB is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

KB vs. HUBB - Dividend Comparison

KB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than HUBB's 1.12% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KB KB Financial Group Inc.	1.96%	2.92%	4.98%	2.81%	5.78%	5.27%	3.97%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.10%	3.05%
HUBB Hubbell Incorporated	1.12%	1.21%	1.19%	1.39%	1.82%	1.92%	2.37%	2.32%	3.17%	2.12%	2.22%	0.00%

Drawdowns

KB vs. HUBB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KB drawdown since its inception was -84.27%, which is greater than HUBB's maximum drawdown of -41.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KB and HUBB.

Drawdown Indicators

	KB	HUBB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.27%	-41.63%	-42.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.50%	-13.80%	-3.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.89%	-32.65%	-10.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.92%	-41.63%	-25.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.63%	-6.79%	-8.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.40%	-7.40%	-33.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.38%	4.65%	+2.73%

Volatility

KB vs. HUBB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KB Financial Group Inc. (KB) is 9.74%, while Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) has a volatility of 12.22%. This indicates that KB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KB	HUBB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.74%	12.22%	-2.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.03%	21.61%	+2.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.12%	31.35%	+6.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.22%	28.82%	+4.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.55%	28.53%	+4.02%

Financials

KB vs. HUBB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between KB Financial Group Inc. and Hubbell Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

KB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, KB Financial Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 10.77T and revenue of 22.69T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.5%.

HUBB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hubbell Incorporated reported a gross profit of 525.10M and revenue of 1.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.2%.

KB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, KB Financial Group Inc. reported an operating income of 1.62T and revenue of 22.69T, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.

HUBB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hubbell Incorporated reported an operating income of 311.50M and revenue of 1.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.9%.

KB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, KB Financial Group Inc. reported a net income of 721.24B and revenue of 22.69T, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.

HUBB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hubbell Incorporated reported a net income of 224.20M and revenue of 1.49B, resulting in a net margin of 15.0%.