KARS vs. MCHI

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

KARS (KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF) and MCHI (iShares MSCI China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KARS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Electric Vehicles Index, while MCHI is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KARS returned -7.36%/yr vs -2.80%/yr for MCHI. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. KARS charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for MCHI.

Performance

KARS vs. MCHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KARS achieves a -3.13% return, which is significantly higher than MCHI's -6.49% return.

KARS

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: -5.58%
• 6M: -5.36%
• YTD: -3.13%
• 1Y: 25.51%
• 3Y*: -3.57%
• 5Y*: -7.36%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.49%

MCHI

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 9.61%
• 6M: -9.98%
• YTD: -6.49%
• 1Y: 0.60%
• 3Y*: 7.33%
• 5Y*: -2.80%
• 10Y*: 4.22%
• ALL TIME*: 2.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
KARS KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF	$357.33K	$457.30K	$1.09M
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF	$148.99M	$159.51M	$173.67M

KARS vs. MCHI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
KARS KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF	-3.13%	46.04%	-17.88%	-7.85%	-39.20%	24.11%	71.17%	34.66%	-28.04%
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF	-6.49%	31.04%	17.73%	-11.94%	-23.01%	-21.74%	27.78%	23.72%	-26.43%

Correlation

The correlation between KARS and MCHI is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2018	0.70

The correlation between KARS and MCHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

KARS vs. MCHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KARS	MCHI
Consumer Cyclical	35.9%	22.4%
Basic Materials	25.4%	5.1%
Industrials	20.7%	5.4%
Technology	18.0%	13.9%
Communication Services	-	19.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.9%
Energy	-	3.4%
Financial Services	-	19.2%
Healthcare	-	5.3%
Real Estate	-	1.5%
Utilities	-	1.6%

Return for Risk

KARS vs. MCHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KARS

KARS Risk / Return Rank: 34
KARS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
KARS Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
KARS Omega Ratio Rank: 35
KARS Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
KARS Martin Ratio Rank: 33

MCHI

MCHI Risk / Return Rank: 10
MCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
MCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
MCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 10
MCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
MCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KARS vs. MCHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KARS	MCHI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	-0.05	+0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	0.08	+1.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.01	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.02	-0.04	+1.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.12	-0.09	+3.21

KARS vs. MCHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KARS Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is higher than the MCHI Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KARS and MCHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KARS vs. MCHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KARS drawdown since its inception was -64.85%, roughly equal to the maximum MCHI drawdown of -62.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KARS and MCHI.

Drawdown Indicators

	KARS	MCHI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.85%	-62.95%	-1.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.94%	-23.22%	-1.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.42%	-25.35%	-20.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.85%	-51.41%	-13.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-62.95%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.95%	-36.24%	-4.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.48%	-24.67%	-3.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.11%	11.26%	-3.15%

Volatility

KARS vs. MCHI - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) has a higher volatility of 8.37% compared to iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) at 5.57%. This indicates that KARS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KARS	MCHI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.37%	5.57%	+2.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.26%	14.73%	+7.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.30%	20.62%	+7.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.00%	30.41%	-0.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.40%	27.35%	+2.05%

KARS vs. MCHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

KARS has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than MCHI's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

KARS vs. MCHI - Dividend Comparison

KARS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than MCHI's 1.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KARS KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF	0.19%	0.18%	0.78%	0.88%	1.13%	6.73%	0.14%	1.85%	1.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF	1.96%	2.12%	2.31%	2.66%	1.78%	1.04%	1.04%	1.45%	1.60%	1.56%	1.66%	2.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KARS and MCHI in my portfolio?

KARS and MCHI have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KARS or MCHI?

KARS has higher volatility (8.37%) compared to MCHI (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KARS dropped -64.85% vs MCHI's -62.95%.

Which ETF is better, KARS or MCHI?

On 5-year performance, MCHI leads with -2.80% vs -7.36% for KARS. On fees, MCHI is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, MCHI has been the lower-risk option at 5.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KARS or MCHI?

Over the 5-year period, MCHI has performed better with a -2.80% return vs -7.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KARS or MCHI?

MCHI is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for KARS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KARS or MCHI?

MCHI has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.19% for KARS.

What is the main difference between KARS and MCHI?

KARS is categorized as Industrials Equities, while MCHI is China Equities. KARS tracks Bloomberg Electric Vehicles Index, while MCHI tracks MSCI China Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for KARS and 0.59% for MCHI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KARS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.