PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KAP.IL vs. URNM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KAP.IL vs. URNM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom (KAP.IL) and NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KAP.IL vs. URNM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
KAP.IL
JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom
39.78%56.56%-1.79%55.11%-17.73%114.56%48.52%1.17%
URNM
NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF
16.36%40.78%-14.13%57.80%-11.86%78.32%68.36%3.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KAP.IL achieves a 39.78% return, which is significantly higher than URNM's 16.36% return.


KAP.IL

1D
-1.64%
1M
-9.20%
YTD
39.78%
6M
47.17%
1Y
142.98%
3Y*
47.05%
5Y*
32.89%
10Y*

URNM

1D
1.14%
1M
-15.47%
YTD
16.36%
6M
10.70%
1Y
103.12%
3Y*
30.96%
5Y*
20.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KAP.IL vs. URNM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KAP.IL
KAP.IL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
KAP.IL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KAP.IL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
KAP.IL Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
KAP.IL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
KAP.IL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

URNM
URNM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
URNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
URNM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
URNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
URNM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KAP.IL vs. URNM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom (KAP.IL) and NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KAP.ILURNMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.27

2.01

+1.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.65

2.60

+1.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.32

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.24

3.36

+4.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.50

9.26

+15.24

KAP.IL vs. URNM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KAP.IL Sharpe Ratio is 3.27, which is higher than the URNM Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KAP.IL and URNM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KAP.ILURNMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.27

2.01

+1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.43

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.71

+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between KAP.IL and URNM is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

KAP.IL vs. URNM - Dividend Comparison

KAP.IL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than URNM's 2.73% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
KAP.IL
JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom
3.17%4.43%6.85%4.25%6.44%3.69%5.14%6.23%
URNM
NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF
2.73%3.18%3.18%3.63%0.00%6.70%2.57%0.00%

Drawdowns

KAP.IL vs. URNM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KAP.IL drawdown since its inception was -49.67%, roughly equal to the maximum URNM drawdown of -50.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KAP.IL and URNM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KAP.ILURNMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.67%

-50.78%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.34%

-30.79%

+13.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.67%

-50.78%

+1.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.30%

-23.96%

+14.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.07%

-17.89%

+2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.84%

11.19%

-5.35%

Volatility

KAP.IL vs. URNM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom (KAP.IL) is 15.65%, while NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) has a volatility of 17.16%. This indicates that KAP.IL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URNM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KAP.ILURNMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.65%

17.16%

-1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.70%

40.48%

-1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.58%

51.55%

-4.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.17%

47.95%

-0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.93%

46.74%

-3.81%