KAP.IL vs. CCJ
Compare and contrast key facts about JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom (KAP.IL) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KAP.IL or CCJ.
Key characteristics
| KAP.IL | CCJ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 0.37% | 12.32% |
| 1Y Return | 56.73% | 82.28% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 20.34% | 39.05% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 29.88% | 35.36% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.41 | 2.11 |
| Daily Std Dev | 39.99% | 38.25% |
| Max Drawdown | -49.67% | -87.86% |
| Current Drawdown | -13.58% | -4.25% |
Fundamentals
| KAP.IL | CCJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $10.98B | $21.43B |
| EPS | $3.25 | $0.61 |
| PE Ratio | 12.63 | 80.90 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $2.59B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $312.51B | $629.11M |
Correlation
The correlation between KAP.IL and CCJ is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
KAP.IL vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, KAP.IL achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than CCJ's 12.32% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KAP.IL vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom (KAP.IL) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KAP.IL vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison
KAP.IL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, more than CCJ's 0.18% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KAP.IL JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom | 4.24% | 4.25% | 6.44% | 3.82% | 5.14% | 6.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.46% | 0.68% | 0.53% | 3.37% | 2.88% | 2.49% | 2.19% | 1.85% |
Drawdowns
KAP.IL vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KAP.IL drawdown since its inception was -49.67%, smaller than the maximum CCJ drawdown of -87.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KAP.IL and CCJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KAP.IL vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom (KAP.IL) is 9.47%, while Cameco Corporation (CCJ) has a volatility of 11.43%. This indicates that KAP.IL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
KAP.IL vs. CCJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities