Correlation
The correlation between KALL and MCHI is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
KALL vs. MCHI
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI).
KALL and MCHI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KALL is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China All Shares. It was launched on Feb 13, 2015. MCHI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China Index. It was launched on Mar 29, 2011. Both KALL and MCHI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KALL or MCHI.
Performance
KALL vs. MCHI - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
KALL:
0.46
MCHI:
0.62
KALL:
0.79
MCHI:
1.05
KALL:
1.12
MCHI:
1.14
KALL:
0.26
MCHI:
0.36
KALL:
0.84
MCHI:
1.60
KALL:
16.08%
MCHI:
12.56%
KALL:
33.90%
MCHI:
34.61%
KALL:
-56.32%
MCHI:
-62.84%
KALL:
-39.04%
MCHI:
-40.72%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KALL achieves a 8.39% return, which is significantly lower than MCHI's 12.72% return. Over the past 10 years, KALL has underperformed MCHI with an annualized return of 0.20%, while MCHI has yielded a comparatively higher 0.52% annualized return.
KALL
8.39%
-0.02%
8.79%
17.43%
1.56%
0.48%
0.20%
MCHI
12.72%
-1.12%
13.76%
23.38%
3.29%
-0.91%
0.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KALL vs. MCHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
KALL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than MCHI's 0.59% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KALL vs. MCHI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
KALL
MCHI
KALL vs. MCHI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
KALL vs. MCHI - Dividend Comparison
KALL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than MCHI's 2.05% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KALL KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF | 2.15% | 2.33% | 3.37% | 3.68% | 4.64% | 1.01% | 1.45% | 2.06% | 1.22% | 4.32% | 1.60% | 0.00% |
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | 2.05% | 2.31% | 3.49% | 2.16% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.45% | 1.60% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 2.76% | 2.35% |
Drawdowns
KALL vs. MCHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KALL drawdown since its inception was -56.32%, smaller than the maximum MCHI drawdown of -62.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KALL and MCHI.
Loading data...
Volatility
KALL vs. MCHI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL) is 5.24%, while iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) has a volatility of 7.13%. This indicates that KALL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...