KALL vs. MCHI
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI).
KALL and MCHI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KALL is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China All Shares. It was launched on Feb 13, 2015. MCHI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China Index. It was launched on Mar 29, 2011. Both KALL and MCHI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KALL or MCHI.
Correlation
The correlation between KALL and MCHI is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
KALL vs. MCHI - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
KALL:
0.42
MCHI:
0.51
KALL:
0.84
MCHI:
0.98
KALL:
1.12
MCHI:
1.13
KALL:
0.24
MCHI:
0.27
KALL:
1.10
MCHI:
1.43
KALL:
12.26%
MCHI:
11.40%
KALL:
31.91%
MCHI:
31.97%
KALL:
-56.32%
MCHI:
-62.84%
KALL:
-47.48%
MCHI:
-50.94%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with KALL having a -6.62% return and MCHI slightly lower at -6.72%.
KALL
-6.62%
-9.08%
1.72%
12.96%
-4.67%
N/A
MCHI
-6.72%
-8.81%
1.22%
15.37%
-6.60%
0.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KALL vs. MCHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
KALL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than MCHI's 0.59% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KALL vs. MCHI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
KALL
MCHI
KALL vs. MCHI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KALL vs. MCHI - Dividend Comparison
KALL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, which matches MCHI's 2.48% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KALL KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF | 2.49% | 2.33% | 3.37% | 2.28% | 4.64% | 1.01% | 1.45% | 2.06% | 1.21% | 6.62% | 0.56% | 0.00% |
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | 2.48% | 2.31% | 3.49% | 2.16% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.45% | 1.60% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 2.76% | 2.35% |
Drawdowns
KALL vs. MCHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KALL drawdown since its inception was -56.32%, smaller than the maximum MCHI drawdown of -62.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KALL and MCHI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KALL vs. MCHI - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) have volatilities of 6.45% and 6.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.