Correlation
The correlation between KALL and MCH is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
KALL vs. MCH
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL) and Matthews China Active ETF (MCH).
KALL and MCH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KALL is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China All Shares. It was launched on Feb 13, 2015. MCH is an actively managed fund by Matthews Asia. It was launched on Jul 13, 2022.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KALL or MCH.
Performance
KALL vs. MCH - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
KALL:
0.46
MCH:
0.40
KALL:
0.79
MCH:
0.80
KALL:
1.12
MCH:
1.11
KALL:
0.26
MCH:
0.36
KALL:
0.84
MCH:
0.78
KALL:
16.08%
MCH:
16.88%
KALL:
33.90%
MCH:
36.87%
KALL:
-56.32%
MCH:
-40.53%
KALL:
-39.04%
MCH:
-19.09%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KALL achieves a 8.39% return, which is significantly higher than MCH's 6.26% return.
KALL
8.39%
3.18%
8.90%
16.00%
1.56%
0.48%
0.20%
MCH
6.26%
3.85%
4.58%
14.70%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KALL vs. MCH - Expense Ratio Comparison
KALL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than MCH's 0.79% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KALL vs. MCH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
KALL
MCH
KALL vs. MCH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL) and Matthews China Active ETF (MCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
KALL vs. MCH - Dividend Comparison
KALL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than MCH's 1.24% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KALL KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF | 2.15% | 2.33% | 3.37% | 3.68% | 4.64% | 1.01% | 1.45% | 2.06% | 1.22% | 4.32% | 1.60% |
MCH Matthews China Active ETF | 1.24% | 1.32% | 1.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
KALL vs. MCH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KALL drawdown since its inception was -56.32%, which is greater than MCH's maximum drawdown of -40.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KALL and MCH.
Loading data...
Volatility
KALL vs. MCH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL) is 5.24%, while Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that KALL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...