KALL vs. GNT
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL) and GAMCO Natural Resources, Gold & Income Trust (GNT).
KALL is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China All Shares. It was launched on Feb 13, 2015.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KALL or GNT.
Correlation
The correlation between KALL and GNT is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
KALL vs. GNT - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
KALL:
0.44
GNT:
1.17
KALL:
0.88
GNT:
1.77
KALL:
1.13
GNT:
1.27
KALL:
0.30
GNT:
1.97
KALL:
0.97
GNT:
6.45
KALL:
16.28%
GNT:
3.88%
KALL:
34.02%
GNT:
19.55%
KALL:
-56.32%
GNT:
-68.58%
KALL:
-39.04%
GNT:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KALL achieves a 8.38% return, which is significantly lower than GNT's 19.48% return. Over the past 10 years, KALL has underperformed GNT with an annualized return of 0.32%, while GNT has yielded a comparatively higher 5.99% annualized return.
KALL
8.38%
9.12%
4.64%
14.39%
0.35%
0.32%
GNT
19.48%
9.20%
10.04%
22.52%
12.97%
5.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KALL vs. GNT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
KALL
GNT
KALL vs. GNT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL) and GAMCO Natural Resources, Gold & Income Trust (GNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
KALL vs. GNT - Dividend Comparison
KALL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than GNT's 6.99% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KALL KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF | 2.15% | 2.33% | 3.37% | 2.28% | 4.64% | 1.01% | 1.45% | 2.06% | 1.21% | 6.62% | 0.56% | 0.00% |
GNT GAMCO Natural Resources, Gold & Income Trust | 6.99% | 7.37% | 7.00% | 7.03% | 6.73% | 9.39% | 10.07% | 12.12% | 8.94% | 12.59% | 14.66% | 13.38% |
Drawdowns
KALL vs. GNT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KALL drawdown since its inception was -56.32%, smaller than the maximum GNT drawdown of -68.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KALL and GNT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
KALL vs. GNT - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL) has a higher volatility of 6.32% compared to GAMCO Natural Resources, Gold & Income Trust (GNT) at 5.49%. This indicates that KALL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...