KALL vs. CQQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ).
KALL and CQQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KALL is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China All Shares. It was launched on Feb 13, 2015. CQQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the AlphaShares China Technology Index. It was launched on Dec 8, 2009. Both KALL and CQQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KALL or CQQQ.
Correlation
The correlation between KALL and CQQQ is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
KALL vs. CQQQ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
KALL:
0.59
CQQQ:
0.73
KALL:
1.04
CQQQ:
1.35
KALL:
1.16
CQQQ:
1.16
KALL:
0.39
CQQQ:
0.43
KALL:
1.28
CQQQ:
2.18
KALL:
15.65%
CQQQ:
14.30%
KALL:
33.94%
CQQQ:
42.39%
KALL:
-56.32%
CQQQ:
-73.99%
KALL:
-42.71%
CQQQ:
-62.72%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KALL achieves a 1.85% return, which is significantly higher than CQQQ's 1.45% return. Over the past 10 years, KALL has underperformed CQQQ with an annualized return of -0.39%, while CQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher -0.11% annualized return.
KALL
1.85%
-12.80%
-3.16%
17.76%
-0.57%
-0.39%
CQQQ
1.45%
-18.34%
-3.54%
29.47%
-4.93%
-0.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KALL vs. CQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
KALL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CQQQ's 0.70% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KALL vs. CQQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
KALL
CQQQ
KALL vs. CQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KALL vs. CQQQ - Dividend Comparison
KALL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, more than CQQQ's 0.28% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KALL KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF | 2.29% | 2.33% | 3.37% | 2.28% | 4.64% | 1.01% | 1.45% | 2.06% | 1.21% | 6.62% | 0.56% | 0.00% |
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF | 0.28% | 0.28% | 0.55% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 0.01% | 0.43% | 1.42% | 1.69% | 1.77% | 1.00% |
Drawdowns
KALL vs. CQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KALL drawdown since its inception was -56.32%, smaller than the maximum CQQQ drawdown of -73.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KALL and CQQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KALL vs. CQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL) is 12.75%, while Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) has a volatility of 16.91%. This indicates that KALL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.