KALL vs. CQQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ).
KALL and CQQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KALL is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China All Shares. It was launched on Feb 13, 2015. CQQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the AlphaShares China Technology Index. It was launched on Dec 8, 2009. Both KALL and CQQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KALL or CQQQ.
Correlation
The correlation between KALL and CQQQ is -0.40. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
KALL vs. CQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
KALL:
38.01%
CQQQ:
29.12%
KALL:
-3.35%
CQQQ:
-3.29%
KALL:
-0.67%
CQQQ:
-3.29%
Returns By Period
KALL
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CQQQ
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KALL vs. CQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
KALL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CQQQ's 0.70% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KALL vs. CQQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
KALL
CQQQ
KALL vs. CQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
KALL vs. CQQQ - Dividend Comparison
KALL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than CQQQ's 0.26% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KALL KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF | 2.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
KALL vs. CQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KALL drawdown since its inception was -3.35%, roughly equal to the maximum CQQQ drawdown of -3.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KALL and CQQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
KALL vs. CQQQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading data...