K.TO vs. ^TNX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) and Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX).

Performance

K.TO vs. ^TNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) and Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

K.TO vs. ^TNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
K.TO Kinross Gold Corporation	15.19%	191.81%	69.10%	49.15%	-22.64%	-19.94%	52.79%	40.00%	-18.82%	29.36%
^TNX Treasury Yield 10 Years	5.06%	-13.14%	28.45%	-2.53%	174.83%	63.40%	-53.02%	-32.07%	21.16%	-7.94%

Different Trading Currencies

K.TO is traded in CAD, while ^TNX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^TNX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, K.TO achieves a 15.19% return, which is significantly higher than ^TNX's 5.06% return. Over the past 10 years, K.TO has outperformed ^TNX with an annualized return of 26.99%, while ^TNX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.92% annualized return.

K.TO

• 1D: 4.58%
• 1M: -11.45%
• YTD: 15.19%
• 6M: 25.72%
• 1Y: 148.51%
• 3Y*: 93.97%
• 5Y*: 40.83%
• 10Y*: 26.99%

^TNX

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 8.43%
• YTD: 5.06%
• 6M: 4.89%
• 1Y: 0.97%
• 3Y*: 8.32%
• 5Y*: 23.30%
• 10Y*: 9.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

K.TO vs. ^TNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

K.TO

K.TO Risk / Return Rank: 94
K.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
K.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
K.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 92
K.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
K.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

^TNX

^TNX Risk / Return Rank: 22
^TNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
^TNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
^TNX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
^TNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
^TNX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

K.TO vs. ^TNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) and Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	K.TO	^TNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.01	0.05	+2.96
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.03	0.21	+2.82
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.02	+0.41
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.90	-0.12	+5.02
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.40	-0.20	+17.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

K.TO vs. ^TNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current K.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is higher than the ^TNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of K.TO and ^TNX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	K.TO	^TNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.01	0.05	+2.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98	0.69	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	0.21	+0.38
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	0.07	+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between K.TO and ^TNX is -0.20. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Drawdowns

K.TO vs. ^TNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum K.TO drawdown since its inception was -95.68%, which is greater than ^TNX's maximum drawdown of -84.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for K.TO and ^TNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	K.TO	^TNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.68%	-93.78%	-1.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.96%	-13.99%	-15.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.77%	-31.74%	-27.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-68.19%	-84.57%	+16.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.23%	-46.17%	+31.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.07%	-51.38%	-14.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.44%	8.39%	+0.05%

Volatility

K.TO vs. ^TNX - Volatility Comparison

Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.60% compared to Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) at 6.30%. This indicates that K.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^TNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	K.TO	^TNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.60%	6.30%	+10.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.12%	11.34%	+28.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.67%	19.20%	+30.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.74%	33.89%	+7.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.20%	48.45%	-2.25%