JRS vs. CINF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JRS (Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund) and CINF (Cincinnati Financial Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — JRS in Asset Management, CINF in Insurance - Property & Casualty. Over the past 10 years, JRS returned 5.48%/yr vs 11.49%/yr for CINF. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

JRS vs. CINF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund (JRS) and Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRS achieves a 8.38% return, which is significantly higher than CINF's -2.68% return. Over the past 10 years, JRS has underperformed CINF with an annualized return of 5.48%, while CINF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.49% annualized return.

JRS

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 8.38%
• 6M: 8.26%
• 1Y: 11.76%
• 3Y*: 13.10%
• 5Y*: 2.26%
• 10Y*: 5.48%

CINF

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -0.97%
• YTD: -2.68%
• 6M: -1.87%
• 1Y: 6.69%
• 3Y*: 19.23%
• 5Y*: 7.56%
• 10Y*: 11.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRS vs. CINF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JRS Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund	8.38%	-3.38%	19.74%	13.42%	-35.61%	62.86%	-12.66%	34.92%	-18.07%	14.38%
CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation	-2.68%	16.27%	42.48%	4.00%	-7.89%	33.28%	-14.15%	38.87%	6.25%	2.34%

Correlation

The correlation between JRS and CINF is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2001	0.38

Fundamentals

EPS JRS : $0.73 CINF : $23.30
PE Ratio JRS : 11.18 CINF : 6.78
PEG Ratio JRS : 0.33 CINF : 0.20
PS Ratio JRS : 6.00 CINF : 1.45
Total Revenue (TTM) JRS : $39.07M CINF : $12.92B
Gross Profit (TTM) JRS : $34.33M CINF : $5.39B
EBITDA (TTM) JRS : $39.91M CINF : $3.27B

Return for Risk

JRS vs. CINF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRS

JRS Risk / Return Rank: 63
JRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
JRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
JRS Omega Ratio Rank: 58
JRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
JRS Martin Ratio Rank: 68

CINF

CINF Risk / Return Rank: 50
CINF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
CINF Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
CINF Omega Ratio Rank: 43
CINF Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
CINF Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRS vs. CINF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund (JRS) and Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JRS	CINF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	0.35	+0.49
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.29	0.61	+0.68
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.07	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.06	0.64	+0.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.44	1.66	+1.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JRS vs. CINF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRS Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is higher than the CINF Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRS and CINF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JRS	CINF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84	0.35	+0.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	0.30	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23	0.40	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.42	-0.19

Drawdowns

JRS vs. CINF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRS drawdown since its inception was -87.80%, which is greater than CINF's maximum drawdown of -59.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRS and CINF.

Drawdown Indicators

	JRS	CINF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.80%	-59.64%	-28.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.10%	-10.46%	-0.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.33%	-20.03%	-5.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.57%	-35.77%	-9.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.64%	-58.12%	+3.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.42%	-7.94%	-0.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.07%	-12.20%	-6.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.42%	4.05%	-0.63%

Volatility

JRS vs. CINF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund (JRS) is 4.08%, while Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that JRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CINF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JRS	CINF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.08%	4.44%	-0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.83%	13.21%	-2.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.13%	19.42%	-5.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.89%	25.65%	-3.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.30%	28.79%	-4.49%

Dividends

JRS vs. CINF - Dividend Comparison

JRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.37%, more than CINF's 2.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation	2.25%	2.13%	2.25%	2.90%	2.70%	2.21%	2.75%	2.13%	2.74%	3.33%	2.53%	3.89%
JRS Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund	8.37%	8.88%	7.88%	8.70%	11.06%	5.93%	9.00%	7.16%	9.99%	8.88%	9.10%	9.04%

Financials

JRS vs. CINF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund and Cincinnati Financial Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

JRS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund reported a gross profit of 9.59M and revenue of 11.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.1%.

CINF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

JRS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund reported an operating income of 8.66M and revenue of 11.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 77.7%.

CINF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 2.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

JRS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund reported a net income of 6.14M and revenue of 11.14M, resulting in a net margin of 55.2%.

CINF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported a net income of 274.00M and revenue of 2.86B, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JRS and CINF in my portfolio?

JRS and CINF have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JRS or CINF?

CINF has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to JRS (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JRS dropped -87.80% vs CINF's -59.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.