JQUA vs. XLC
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC).
JQUA and XLC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JQUA is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan Chase that tracks the performance of the JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2017. XLC is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index. It was launched on Jun 18, 2018. Both JQUA and XLC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: JQUA or XLC.
Correlation
The correlation between JQUA and XLC is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
JQUA vs. XLC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
JQUA:
-0.00
XLC:
0.38
JQUA:
0.09
XLC:
0.58
JQUA:
1.01
XLC:
1.08
JQUA:
-0.00
XLC:
0.39
JQUA:
-0.01
XLC:
1.95
JQUA:
2.95%
XLC:
3.34%
JQUA:
14.15%
XLC:
17.10%
JQUA:
-32.92%
XLC:
-46.65%
JQUA:
-14.85%
XLC:
-16.92%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JQUA having a -9.69% return and XLC slightly higher at -9.63%.
JQUA
-9.69%
-11.80%
-8.34%
1.23%
17.65%
N/A
XLC
-9.63%
-13.78%
-3.48%
7.99%
16.76%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JQUA vs. XLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
JQUA has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XLC's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
JQUA vs. XLC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
JQUA
XLC
JQUA vs. XLC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
JQUA vs. XLC - Dividend Comparison
JQUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, more than XLC's 1.19% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 1.46% | 1.24% | 1.22% | 1.59% | 1.32% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 2.10% | 0.39% |
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.19% | 0.99% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 0.74% | 0.68% | 0.81% | 0.64% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
JQUA vs. XLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JQUA drawdown since its inception was -32.92%, smaller than the maximum XLC drawdown of -46.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JQUA and XLC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
JQUA vs. XLC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) is 8.28%, while Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) has a volatility of 9.34%. This indicates that JQUA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.