JQUA vs. ACVF
JQUA (JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF) and ACVF (American Conservative Values ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JQUA is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index, while ACVF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Ridgeline Research LLC. JQUA is passively managed, while ACVF is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, JQUA returned 13.92%/yr vs 12.42%/yr for ACVF. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JQUA charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACVF.
Performance
JQUA vs. ACVF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JQUA achieves a 14.16% return, which is significantly higher than ACVF's 10.70% return.
JQUA
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- 14.16%
- 6M
- 14.37%
- 1Y
- 22.69%
- 3Y*
- 20.64%
- 5Y*
- 13.92%
- 10Y*
- —
ACVF
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 5.66%
- YTD
- 10.70%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- 1Y
- 20.55%
- 3Y*
- 19.73%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- —
JQUA vs. ACVF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 14.16% | 11.69% | 21.21% | 25.13% | -13.45% | 28.68% | 13.34% |
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF | 10.70% | 13.67% | 20.56% | 23.81% | -15.74% | 28.84% | 13.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between JQUA and ACVF is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2020 | 0.96 |
The correlation between JQUA and ACVF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
JQUA vs. ACVF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JQUA
ACVF
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
JQUA
ACVF
Financial Services
JQUA
ACVF
Consumer Cyclical
JQUA
ACVF
Industrials
JQUA
ACVF
Healthcare
JQUA
ACVF
Communication Services
JQUA
ACVF
Consumer Defensive
JQUA
ACVF
Energy
JQUA
ACVF
Utilities
JQUA
ACVF
Real Estate
JQUA
ACVF
Basic Materials
JQUA
ACVF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JQUA vs. ACVF — Risk / Return Rank
JQUA
ACVF
JQUA vs. ACVF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) and American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JQUA | ACVF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.32 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 2.68 | +0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.48 | 10.88 | +2.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JQUA | ACVF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 1.81 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.77 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 1.02 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
JQUA vs. ACVF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JQUA drawdown since its inception was -32.92%, which is greater than ACVF's maximum drawdown of -24.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JQUA and ACVF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JQUA | ACVF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.92% | -24.39% | -8.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.13% | -7.70% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.81% | -16.82% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.47% | -24.39% | +1.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -0.43% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.16% | -4.74% | +0.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 1.89% | -0.20% |
Volatility
JQUA vs. ACVF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) is 2.82%, while American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) has a volatility of 3.03%. This indicates that JQUA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACVF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JQUA | ACVF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.82% | 3.03% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.31% | 9.00% | -0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.20% | 11.38% | -0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.61% | 16.23% | -0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 15.96% | +2.03% |
JQUA vs. ACVF - Expense Ratio Comparison
JQUA has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ACVF's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
JQUA vs. ACVF - Dividend Comparison
JQUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than ACVF's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF | 0.53% | 0.59% | 0.59% | 0.82% | 0.93% | 0.61% | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 1.07% | 1.19% | 1.24% | 1.21% | 1.60% | 1.32% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 2.10% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, JQUA and ACVF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ACVF has higher volatility (3.03%) compared to JQUA (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JQUA dropped -32.92% vs ACVF's -24.39%.
On 5-year performance, JQUA leads with 13.92% vs 12.42% for ACVF. On fees, JQUA is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JQUA has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JQUA has performed better with a 13.92% return vs 12.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JQUA is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACVF.
JQUA has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.53% for ACVF.
JQUA is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ACVF is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Ridgeline Research LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JQUA and 0.75% for ACVF.
JQUA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JQUA and ACVF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer