JPY=X vs. IEFA
JPY=X (USD/JPY) is a currency, while IEFA (iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Investable Market Index. Over the past 10 years, JPY=X returned 4.15%/yr vs 13.75%/yr for IEFA. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
JPY=X vs. IEFA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
JPY=X is traded in JPY, while IEFA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IEFA values have been converted to JPY using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPY=X achieves a 1.96% return, which is significantly lower than IEFA's 10.98% return. Over the past 10 years, JPY=X has underperformed IEFA with an annualized return of 4.15%, while IEFA has yielded a comparatively higher 13.75% annualized return.
JPY=X
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 1.72%
- YTD
- 1.96%
- 6M
- 3.03%
- 1Y
- 11.08%
- 3Y*
- 4.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.87%
- 10Y*
- 4.15%
IEFA
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- 10.98%
- 6M
- 14.83%
- 1Y
- 35.52%
- 3Y*
- 22.04%
- 5Y*
- 16.58%
- 10Y*
- 13.75%
JPY=X vs. IEFA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPY=X USD/JPY | 1.96% | -0.29% | 11.58% | 7.54% | 13.91% | 11.47% | -4.94% | -0.97% | -2.63% | -3.70% |
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 10.98% | 31.69% | 15.22% | 26.84% | -3.45% | 24.43% | 2.83% | 21.46% | -16.41% | 21.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPY=X and IEFA is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012 | 0.49 |
Over the past year, the correlation between JPY=X and IEFA has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPY=X vs. IEFA — Risk / Return Rank
JPY=X
IEFA
JPY=X vs. IEFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USD/JPY (JPY=X) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPY=X | IEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 2.58 | -1.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.57 | 3.54 | -1.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.48 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | 3.61 | -1.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.04 | 15.00 | -8.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPY=X | IEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 2.58 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.96 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.70 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.72 | -0.58 |
Drawdowns
JPY=X vs. IEFA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPY=X drawdown since its inception was -38.14%, which is greater than IEFA's maximum drawdown of -35.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPY=X and IEFA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPY=X | IEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.14% | -35.71% | -2.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.34% | -9.89% | +5.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.02% | -16.49% | +3.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.84% | -16.82% | +1.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.84% | -35.71% | +20.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -0.61% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.50% | -6.30% | -8.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.29% | 2.37% | -1.08% |
Volatility
JPY=X vs. IEFA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for USD/JPY (JPY=X) is 0.71%, while iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) has a volatility of 4.16%. This indicates that JPY=X experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPY=X | IEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.71% | 4.16% | -3.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.59% | 10.90% | -5.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.71% | 13.84% | -6.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.58% | 17.38% | -7.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.86% | 19.60% | -10.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPY=X and IEFA have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IEFA has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to JPY=X (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPY=X dropped -38.14% vs IEFA's -35.71%.
IEFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPY=X and IEFA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer