JPME vs. XMHQ
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ).
JPME and XMHQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JPME is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan Chase that tracks the performance of the JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Mid Cap Equity Index. It was launched on May 11, 2016. XMHQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2006. Both JPME and XMHQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: JPME or XMHQ.
Key characteristics
| JPME | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 17.54% | 22.69% |
| 1Y Return | 27.01% | 32.08% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.83% | 10.40% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.20% | 17.14% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.25 | 1.78 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.17 | 2.55 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.39 | 1.30 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.24 | 3.07 |
| Martin Ratio | 12.63 | 7.54 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.18% | 4.20% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.22% | 17.79% |
| Max Drawdown | -41.01% | -58.19% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.92% | -2.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPME and XMHQ is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
JPME vs. XMHQ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, JPME achieves a 17.54% return, which is significantly lower than XMHQ's 22.69% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JPME vs. XMHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPME has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than XMHQ's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
JPME vs. XMHQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
JPME vs. XMHQ - Dividend Comparison
JPME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than XMHQ's 4.91% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPME JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF | 1.70% | 1.84% | 1.84% | 1.44% | 1.51% | 1.68% | 1.80% | 1.17% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 4.91% | 0.73% | 1.72% | 1.00% | 1.12% | 1.22% | 1.59% | 1.06% | 1.64% | 1.34% | 1.25% | 1.11% |
Drawdowns
JPME vs. XMHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPME drawdown since its inception was -41.01%, smaller than the maximum XMHQ drawdown of -58.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPME and XMHQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
JPME vs. XMHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) is 3.66%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that JPME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.