JPLG.L vs. XDEQ.L
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L).
JPLG.L and XDEQ.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JPLG.L is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Jul 9, 2019. XDEQ.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Sep 11, 2014. Both JPLG.L and XDEQ.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: JPLG.L or XDEQ.L.
Key characteristics
| JPLG.L | XDEQ.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 15.06% | 19.64% |
| 1Y Return | 20.85% | 24.69% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.93% | 8.71% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.66% | 12.89% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.48 | 2.24 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.58 | 3.22 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.45 | 1.42 |
| Calmar Ratio | 5.51 | 3.76 |
| Martin Ratio | 16.10 | 13.44 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.27% | 1.80% |
| Daily Std Dev | 8.22% | 10.77% |
| Max Drawdown | -27.53% | -23.79% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPLG.L and XDEQ.L is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
JPLG.L vs. XDEQ.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, JPLG.L achieves a 15.06% return, which is significantly lower than XDEQ.L's 19.64% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JPLG.L vs. XDEQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPLG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XDEQ.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
JPLG.L vs. XDEQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
JPLG.L vs. XDEQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither JPLG.L nor XDEQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPLG.L JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XDEQ.L Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.51% |
Drawdowns
JPLG.L vs. XDEQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPLG.L drawdown since its inception was -27.53%, which is greater than XDEQ.L's maximum drawdown of -23.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPLG.L and XDEQ.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
JPLG.L vs. XDEQ.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) is 2.21%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) has a volatility of 2.54%. This indicates that JPLG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.