PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNUG vs. TMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNUG vs. TMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares (JNUG) and Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X (TMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNUG achieves a -13.94% return, which is significantly lower than TMF's -5.05% return. Over the past 10 years, JNUG has underperformed TMF with an annualized return of -23.85%, while TMF has yielded a comparatively higher -16.47% annualized return.


JNUG

1D
1.51%
1M
-2.04%
YTD
-13.94%
6M
-0.62%
1Y
112.06%
3Y*
71.84%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*
-23.85%

TMF

1D
0.63%
1M
0.26%
YTD
-5.05%
6M
-10.01%
1Y
1.66%
3Y*
-20.47%
5Y*
-29.85%
10Y*
-16.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNUG vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNUG
Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares
-13.94%478.59%9.96%-4.79%-43.60%-46.61%-85.51%82.43%-48.11%-20.18%
TMF
Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X
-5.05%-2.94%-35.95%-13.01%-72.60%-19.80%39.02%34.75%-11.01%22.72%

Correlation

The correlation between JNUG and TMF is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2013

0.18

JNUG vs. TMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JNUG
TMF

Basic Materials

100.0%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

18.7%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

JNUG
100.0%
TMF

-

Communication Services

JNUG

-

TMF

-

Consumer Cyclical

JNUG

-

TMF

-

Consumer Defensive

JNUG

-

TMF

-

Energy

JNUG

-

TMF

-

Financial Services

JNUG

-

TMF
18.7%

Healthcare

JNUG

-

TMF

-

Industrials

JNUG

-

TMF

-

Real Estate

JNUG

-

TMF

-

Technology

JNUG

-

TMF

-

Utilities

JNUG

-

TMF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNUG vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNUG
JNUG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
JNUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNUG Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
JNUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

TMF
TMF Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
TMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMF Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
TMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMF Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNUG vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares (JNUG) and Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JNUGTMFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.14

0.06

+1.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.76

0.29

+1.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.03

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

-0.04

+2.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.48

-0.08

+5.56

JNUG vs. TMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is higher than the TMF Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNUG and TMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JNUGTMFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

0.06

+1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

-0.64

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.22

-0.38

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.29

-0.13

-0.15

Drawdowns

JNUG vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNUG drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, which is greater than TMF's maximum drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNUG and TMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNUGTMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.95%

-92.89%

-7.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.39%

-26.51%

-29.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.39%

-56.31%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.95%

-88.81%

+7.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.66%

-92.89%

-6.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.52%

-92.14%

-7.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-93.89%

-43.62%

-50.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.28%

11.42%

+13.86%

Volatility

JNUG vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares (JNUG) has a higher volatility of 31.67% compared to Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X (TMF) at 8.30%. This indicates that JNUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNUGTMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.67%

8.30%

+23.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

83.60%

19.33%

+64.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

99.37%

28.86%

+70.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.40%

46.75%

+33.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

106.52%

43.92%

+62.60%

JNUG vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNUG has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than TMF's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

JNUG vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison

JNUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than TMF's 4.11% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNUG
Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares
1.43%1.04%2.01%1.62%0.00%0.52%0.10%0.46%0.06%0.51%
TMF
Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X
4.11%4.06%4.29%2.82%1.62%0.13%2.23%0.94%1.49%0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNUG and TMF have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JNUG has higher volatility (31.67%) compared to TMF (8.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNUG dropped -99.95% vs TMF's -92.89%.

On 10-year performance, TMF leads with -16.47% vs -23.85% for JNUG. On fees, TMF is cheaper at 1.09% per year. On volatility, TMF has been the lower-risk option at 8.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TMF has performed better with a -16.47% return vs -23.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TMF is cheaper with a 1.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for JNUG.

TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.11%, compared with 1.43% for JNUG.

JNUG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. JNUG tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (300%), while TMF tracks NYSE 20 Year Plus Treasury Bond Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.17% for JNUG and 1.09% for TMF.

JNUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNUG and TMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer