PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNPR vs. CSCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

JNPR vs. CSCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Juniper Networks, Inc. (JNPR) and Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


JNPR

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CSCO

1D
-1.87%
1M
-1.30%
YTD
53.96%
6M
56.05%
1Y
83.73%
3Y*
34.78%
5Y*
21.06%
10Y*
18.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNPR vs. CSCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNPR
Juniper Networks, Inc.
0.00%7.99%30.11%-4.95%-8.07%63.34%-5.34%-5.66%-3.09%2.27%
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
53.96%33.47%21.00%9.30%-22.46%45.76%-3.49%13.81%16.57%31.27%

Correlation

The correlation between JNPR and CSCO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 1999

0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between JNPR and CSCO has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

JNPR:

$5.20B

CSCO:

$60.75B

Gross Profit (TTM)

JNPR:

$3.06B

CSCO:

$39.08B

EBITDA (TTM)

JNPR:

$628.10M

CSCO:

$13.98B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNPR vs. CSCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNPR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


CSCO
CSCO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CSCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSCO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CSCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSCO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNPR vs. CSCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Juniper Networks, Inc. (JNPR) and Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JNPRCSCODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.74

JNPR vs. CSCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JNPR vs. CSCO - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNPRCSCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.02%

Volatility

JNPR vs. CSCO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNPRCSCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.90%

Dividends

JNPR vs. CSCO - Dividend Comparison

JNPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.41%2.12%2.69%3.07%3.17%2.32%3.20%2.88%2.95%2.95%3.28%3.02%
JNPR
Juniper Networks, Inc.
0.00%1.10%2.35%2.99%2.63%2.24%3.55%3.09%2.68%1.40%1.42%1.45%

Financials

JNPR vs. CSCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Juniper Networks, Inc. and Cisco Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
1.28B
15.84B
(JNPR) Total Revenue
(CSCO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


JNPR and CSCO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNPR and CSCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer