PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNK vs. XLB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNK vs. XLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNK achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly lower than XLB's 14.35% return. Over the past 10 years, JNK has underperformed XLB with an annualized return of 5.01%, while XLB has yielded a comparatively higher 10.23% annualized return.


JNK

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.44%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.97%
1Y
7.24%
3Y*
8.63%
5Y*
3.68%
10Y*
5.01%

XLB

1D
0.21%
1M
1.93%
YTD
14.35%
6M
17.15%
1Y
19.99%
3Y*
11.71%
5Y*
5.35%
10Y*
10.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNK vs. XLB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNK
SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF
1.51%8.76%7.71%12.42%-12.19%4.00%4.95%14.88%-3.28%6.49%
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
14.35%9.94%0.15%12.46%-12.30%27.44%20.46%24.13%-14.88%24.01%

Correlation

The correlation between JNK and XLB is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2007

0.56

The correlation between JNK and XLB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

JNK vs. XLB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JNK
XLB

Technology

0.0%

-

Energy

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

87.6%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

1.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

JNK
0.0%
XLB

-

Energy

JNK
0.0%
XLB

-

Basic Materials

JNK

-

XLB
87.6%

Communication Services

JNK

-

XLB

-

Consumer Cyclical

JNK

-

XLB
12.4%

Consumer Defensive

JNK

-

XLB

-

Financial Services

JNK

-

XLB

-

Healthcare

JNK

-

XLB

-

Industrials

JNK

-

XLB
1.5%

Real Estate

JNK

-

XLB

-

Utilities

JNK

-

XLB

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNK vs. XLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNK
JNK Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
JNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNK Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
JNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNK Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

XLB
XLB Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
XLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLB Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
XLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLB Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNK vs. XLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JNKXLBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.90

1.20

+0.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.89

1.76

+1.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.21

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

1.62

+1.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.79

5.06

+7.73

JNK vs. XLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNK Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the XLB Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNK and XLB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JNKXLBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

1.20

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.28

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.50

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.36

+0.06

Drawdowns

JNK vs. XLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNK drawdown since its inception was -38.48%, smaller than the maximum XLB drawdown of -59.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNK and XLB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNKXLBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.48%

-59.83%

+21.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.51%

-12.38%

+9.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.02%

-23.17%

+18.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.67%

-24.72%

+8.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.89%

-37.27%

+14.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-3.28%

+3.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-10.84%

+7.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.57%

3.96%

-3.39%

Volatility

JNK vs. XLB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) is 1.13%, while Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that JNK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNKXLBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

5.73%

-4.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

12.85%

-9.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.82%

16.78%

-12.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.54%

18.94%

-11.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.31%

20.65%

-12.34%

JNK vs. XLB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNK has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLB's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

JNK vs. XLB - Dividend Comparison

JNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.62%, more than XLB's 1.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JNK
SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF
6.62%6.54%6.63%6.38%6.06%4.27%5.11%5.44%5.90%5.60%6.06%6.59%
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.69%1.92%1.92%2.00%2.26%1.62%1.72%1.98%2.20%1.66%1.95%2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNK and XLB have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLB has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to JNK (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNK dropped -38.48% vs XLB's -59.83%.

On 10-year performance, XLB leads with 10.23% vs 5.01% for JNK. On fees, XLB is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, JNK has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLB has performed better with a 10.23% return vs 5.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLB is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for JNK.

JNK has the higher dividend yield at 6.62%, compared with 1.69% for XLB.

JNK is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while XLB is Materials. JNK tracks Barclays Capital High Yield Very Liquid Index, while XLB tracks Materials Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for JNK and 0.13% for XLB.

JNK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNK and XLB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer