JNK vs. LTPZ
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) and PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ).
JNK and LTPZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JNK is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital High Yield Very Liquid Index. It was launched on Nov 28, 2007. LTPZ is a passively managed fund by PIMCO that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y). It was launched on Sep 3, 2009. Both JNK and LTPZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: JNK or LTPZ.
Key characteristics
| JNK | LTPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 7.55% | -2.21% |
| 1Y Return | 12.80% | 5.17% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 2.30% | -11.93% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 3.43% | -1.94% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 3.69% | 1.12% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.78 | 0.46 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.26 | 0.74 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.54 | 1.08 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.12 | 0.16 |
| Martin Ratio | 21.06 | 1.45 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.62% | 4.24% |
| Daily Std Dev | 4.66% | 13.36% |
| Max Drawdown | -38.48% | -40.99% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.73% | -33.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between JNK and LTPZ is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
JNK vs. LTPZ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, JNK achieves a 7.55% return, which is significantly higher than LTPZ's -2.21% return. Over the past 10 years, JNK has outperformed LTPZ with an annualized return of 3.69%, while LTPZ has yielded a comparatively lower 1.12% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JNK vs. LTPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
JNK has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than LTPZ's 0.20% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
JNK vs. LTPZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) and PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
JNK vs. LTPZ - Dividend Comparison
JNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.57%, more than LTPZ's 3.48% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNK SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF | 6.57% | 6.38% | 6.06% | 4.26% | 5.11% | 5.44% | 5.90% | 5.60% | 6.06% | 6.60% | 5.99% | 6.05% |
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF | 3.48% | 3.71% | 8.38% | 3.56% | 1.42% | 1.74% | 3.80% | 2.25% | 2.32% | 0.71% | 1.77% | 1.28% |
Drawdowns
JNK vs. LTPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNK drawdown since its inception was -38.48%, smaller than the maximum LTPZ drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNK and LTPZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
JNK vs. LTPZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) is 1.20%, while PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that JNK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.