JNJ vs. XLV
JNJ (Johnson & Johnson) is a stock, while XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, JNJ returned 9.85%/yr vs 9.20%/yr for XLV. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
JNJ vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNJ achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -4.29% return. Over the past 10 years, JNJ has outperformed XLV with an annualized return of 9.85%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.20% annualized return.
JNJ
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 9.93%
- 1Y
- 48.18%
- 3Y*
- 15.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.14%
- 10Y*
- 9.85%
XLV
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- -4.29%
- 6M
- -4.06%
- 1Y
- 12.89%
- 3Y*
- 5.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
JNJ vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 9.07% | 47.48% | -4.81% | -8.58% | 5.97% | 11.44% | 10.82% | 16.22% | -5.13% | 24.43% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | -4.29% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -2.08% | 26.04% | 13.30% | 20.45% | 6.28% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between JNJ and XLV is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 1998 | 0.59 |
The correlation between JNJ and XLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JNJ vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank
JNJ
XLV
JNJ vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JNJ | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.91 | 0.88 | +2.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.26 | 1.42 | +2.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.16 | +0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.42 | 1.24 | +3.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.33 | 2.99 | +10.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JNJ | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.91 | 0.88 | +2.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.38 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.56 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.46 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
JNJ vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNJ drawdown since its inception was -50.67%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNJ and XLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNJ | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.67% | -39.17% | -11.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.96% | -10.47% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.95% | -17.11% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.41% | -17.11% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.37% | -28.40% | +1.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.67% | -7.52% | -2.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.88% | -7.12% | -4.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.63% | 4.32% | -0.69% |
Volatility
JNJ vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) at 4.10%. This indicates that JNJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JNJ | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.20% | 4.10% | +1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.17% | 10.24% | +1.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.67% | 14.67% | +2.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.82% | 14.69% | +2.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.45% | 16.55% | +1.90% |
Dividends
JNJ vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
JNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than XLV's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 2.35% | 2.48% | 3.40% | 3.00% | 2.52% | 2.45% | 2.53% | 2.57% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.87% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.70% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JNJ and XLV have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JNJ has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to XLV (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNJ dropped -50.67% vs XLV's -39.17%.
JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JNJ and XLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer