PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNJ vs. XLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNJ vs. XLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNJ achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -4.29% return. Over the past 10 years, JNJ has outperformed XLV with an annualized return of 9.85%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.20% annualized return.


JNJ

1D
0.16%
1M
0.14%
YTD
9.07%
6M
9.93%
1Y
48.18%
3Y*
15.79%
5Y*
9.14%
10Y*
9.85%

XLV

1D
0.79%
1M
1.95%
YTD
-4.29%
6M
-4.06%
1Y
12.89%
3Y*
5.98%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
9.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNJ vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
9.07%47.48%-4.81%-8.58%5.97%11.44%10.82%16.22%-5.13%24.43%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
-4.29%14.50%2.47%2.07%-2.08%26.04%13.30%20.45%6.28%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between JNJ and XLV is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 1998

0.59

The correlation between JNJ and XLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNJ vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNJ
JNJ Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
JNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
JNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNJ vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JNJXLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.91

0.88

+2.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.26

1.42

+2.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.16

+0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.42

1.24

+3.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.33

2.99

+10.34

JNJ vs. XLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is higher than the XLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNJ and XLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JNJXLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91

0.88

+2.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.38

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.56

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.46

+0.08

Drawdowns

JNJ vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNJ drawdown since its inception was -50.67%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNJ and XLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNJXLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.67%

-39.17%

-11.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.96%

-10.47%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.95%

-17.11%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.41%

-17.11%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.37%

-28.40%

+1.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.67%

-7.52%

-2.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.88%

-7.12%

-4.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

4.32%

-0.69%

Volatility

JNJ vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) at 4.10%. This indicates that JNJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNJXLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

4.10%

+1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.17%

10.24%

+1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.67%

14.67%

+2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.82%

14.69%

+2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.45%

16.55%

+1.90%

Dividends

JNJ vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison

JNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than XLV's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
2.35%2.48%3.40%3.00%2.52%2.45%2.53%2.57%2.74%2.38%2.73%2.87%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.70%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNJ and XLV have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JNJ has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to XLV (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNJ dropped -50.67% vs XLV's -39.17%.

JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNJ and XLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer