JMOM vs. XLK
JMOM (JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JMOM is a Momentum fund tracking the JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index, while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JMOM returned 16.28%/yr vs 23.83%/yr for XLK. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JMOM charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
JMOM vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMOM achieves a 22.79% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 36.47% return.
JMOM
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 9.35%
- YTD
- 22.79%
- 6M
- 22.27%
- 1Y
- 36.77%
- 3Y*
- 28.37%
- 5Y*
- 16.28%
- 10Y*
- —
XLK
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 21.09%
- YTD
- 36.47%
- 6M
- 35.71%
- 1Y
- 66.93%
- 3Y*
- 33.90%
- 5Y*
- 23.83%
- 10Y*
- 25.84%
JMOM vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 22.79% | 18.02% | 28.47% | 22.89% | -20.83% | 25.03% | 29.25% | 28.24% | -5.25% | 3.32% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 36.47% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 1.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMOM and XLK is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017 | 0.83 |
The correlation between JMOM and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
JMOM vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JMOM
XLK
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
JMOM
XLK
Industrials
JMOM
XLK
Financial Services
JMOM
XLK
-
Healthcare
JMOM
XLK
-
Communication Services
JMOM
XLK
-
Consumer Cyclical
JMOM
XLK
-
Consumer Defensive
JMOM
XLK
-
Energy
JMOM
XLK
Real Estate
JMOM
XLK
-
Utilities
JMOM
XLK
-
Basic Materials
JMOM
XLK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMOM vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
JMOM
XLK
JMOM vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JMOM | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.52 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.69 | 4.22 | +0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.24 | 14.16 | +8.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JMOM | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58 | 3.24 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | 0.96 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.42 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
JMOM vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMOM drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMOM and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMOM | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.31% | -82.05% | +47.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.87% | -15.92% | +8.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.51% | -25.66% | +6.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.26% | -33.56% | +5.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -1.00% | +0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.32% | -34.96% | +28.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 4.74% | -3.08% |
Volatility
JMOM vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) is 4.62%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 6.98%. This indicates that JMOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMOM | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 6.98% | -2.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.55% | 16.68% | -5.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.32% | 20.82% | -6.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 24.90% | -6.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.13% | 24.49% | -4.36% |
JMOM vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMOM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JMOM vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
JMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, more than XLK's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.71% | 0.86% | 0.75% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.39% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMOM and XLK have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (6.98%) compared to JMOM (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMOM dropped -34.31% vs XLK's -82.05%.
On 5-year performance, XLK leads with 23.83% vs 16.28% for JMOM. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, JMOM has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XLK has performed better with a 23.83% return vs 16.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for JMOM.
JMOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.39% for XLK.
JMOM is categorized as Momentum, while XLK is Technology Equities. JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JMOM and 0.08% for XLK.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JMOM and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer