PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMEE vs. FNDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMEE vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF (JMEE) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMEE achieves a 16.40% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 21.21% return.


JMEE

1D
-0.27%
1M
3.29%
YTD
16.40%
6M
16.48%
1Y
31.14%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
10Y*

FNDF

1D
-0.67%
1M
6.97%
YTD
21.21%
6M
24.72%
1Y
44.71%
3Y*
24.10%
5Y*
13.35%
10Y*
11.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMEE vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
JMEE
JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF
16.40%7.65%13.65%18.12%1.37%
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
21.21%40.99%2.29%20.22%1.32%

Correlation

The correlation between JMEE and FNDF is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2022

0.72

The correlation between JMEE and FNDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

JMEE vs. FNDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JMEE
FNDF

Industrials

21.3%
15.9%

Financial Services

15.9%
16.7%

Technology

15.8%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.1%
10.7%

Healthcare

8.8%
5.5%

Real Estate

8.1%
0.9%

Energy

5.5%
12.3%

Basic Materials

4.8%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
6.9%

Utilities

2.2%
3.8%

Communication Services

1.7%
4.9%

Industrials

JMEE
21.3%
FNDF
15.9%

Financial Services

JMEE
15.9%
FNDF
16.7%

Technology

JMEE
15.8%
FNDF
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

JMEE
12.1%
FNDF
10.7%

Healthcare

JMEE
8.8%
FNDF
5.5%

Real Estate

JMEE
8.1%
FNDF
0.9%

Energy

JMEE
5.5%
FNDF
12.3%

Basic Materials

JMEE
4.8%
FNDF
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

JMEE
3.9%
FNDF
6.9%

Utilities

JMEE
2.2%
FNDF
3.8%

Communication Services

JMEE
1.7%
FNDF
4.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMEE vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMEE
JMEE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
JMEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMEE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
JMEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMEE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDF
FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMEE vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF (JMEE) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JMEEFNDFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.53

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.80

4.24

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.32

16.19

-2.87

JMEE vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMEE Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is lower than the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMEE and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMEEFNDFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

2.99

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.54

+0.19

Drawdowns

JMEE vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMEE drawdown since its inception was -25.40%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMEE and FNDF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMEEFNDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.40%

-40.14%

+14.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.24%

-10.60%

+2.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.40%

-13.89%

-11.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-0.67%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.39%

-7.64%

+2.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

2.77%

-0.43%

Volatility

JMEE vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF (JMEE) is 4.45%, while Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that JMEE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMEEFNDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

5.26%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.26%

12.53%

-1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.90%

15.06%

+0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.50%

16.18%

+3.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.50%

17.67%

+1.83%

JMEE vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMEE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JMEE vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

JMEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than FNDF's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
2.84%3.44%4.01%3.41%3.10%3.54%2.17%3.20%3.47%2.32%2.42%2.08%
JMEE
JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF
0.97%1.13%0.95%1.25%6.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMEE and FNDF have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNDF has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to JMEE (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMEE dropped -25.40% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

On 3-year performance, FNDF leads with 24.10% vs 17.37% for JMEE. On fees, JMEE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, JMEE has been the lower-risk option at 4.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 24.10% return vs 17.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JMEE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDF.

FNDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 0.97% for JMEE.

JMEE is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while FNDF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for JMEE and 0.25% for FNDF.

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMEE and FNDF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer