JMBS vs. BIV
JMBS (Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF) and BIV (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JMBS is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by Janus Henderson, while BIV is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. 5–10 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Bond Index. JMBS is actively managed, while BIV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JMBS returned 0.74%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for BIV. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JMBS charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BIV.
Performance
JMBS vs. BIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMBS achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly higher than BIV's -0.24% return.
JMBS
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 0.73%
- 1Y
- 7.18%
- 3Y*
- 4.66%
- 5Y*
- 0.74%
- 10Y*
- —
BIV
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- -0.24%
- 6M
- -0.48%
- 1Y
- 4.80%
- 3Y*
- 4.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.25%
- 10Y*
- 1.91%
JMBS vs. BIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMBS Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 0.51% | 8.82% | 1.53% | 5.66% | -11.40% | -0.32% | 5.80% | 7.11% | 1.53% |
BIV Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF | -0.24% | 8.52% | 1.57% | 6.07% | -13.21% | -2.40% | 9.67% | 10.34% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMBS and BIV is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2018 | 0.80 |
The correlation between JMBS and BIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.94 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMBS vs. BIV — Risk / Return Rank
JMBS
BIV
JMBS vs. BIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JMBS | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.21 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 1.52 | +0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.80 | 4.60 | +3.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JMBS | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 1.19 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.04 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.65 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
JMBS vs. BIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMBS drawdown since its inception was -16.68%, smaller than the maximum BIV drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMBS and BIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMBS | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.68% | -18.95% | +2.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.05% | -3.18% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.76% | -6.07% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.68% | -18.74% | +2.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | -2.04% | +0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.90% | -3.39% | -0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 1.05% | -0.13% |
Volatility
JMBS vs. BIV - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS) has a higher volatility of 1.65% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) at 1.36%. This indicates that JMBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMBS | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.65% | 1.36% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.23% | 2.90% | +0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.31% | 4.06% | +0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.49% | 6.40% | +0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.52% | 5.50% | +0.02% |
JMBS vs. BIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMBS has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than BIV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
JMBS vs. BIV - Dividend Comparison
JMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%, more than BIV's 4.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIV Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF | 4.22% | 4.01% | 3.79% | 3.09% | 2.41% | 3.42% | 2.95% | 2.75% | 2.88% | 2.69% | 3.01% | 3.02% |
JMBS Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 5.19% | 5.03% | 5.53% | 4.38% | 2.73% | 1.16% | 2.92% | 3.63% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, JMBS and BIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
JMBS has higher volatility (1.65%) compared to BIV (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMBS dropped -16.68% vs BIV's -18.95%.
On 5-year performance, JMBS leads with 0.74% vs 0.25% for BIV. On fees, BIV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BIV has been the lower-risk option at 1.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JMBS has performed better with a 0.74% return vs 0.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BIV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for JMBS.
JMBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.19%, compared with 4.22% for BIV.
JMBS is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while BIV is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for JMBS and 0.03% for BIV.
JMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JMBS and BIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer