PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JKS vs. GSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

JKS vs. GSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. (JKS) and Ferroglobe PLC (GSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JKS achieves a -27.32% return, which is significantly lower than GSM's -19.63% return. Over the past 10 years, JKS has outperformed GSM with an annualized return of 1.19%, while GSM has yielded a comparatively lower -7.31% annualized return.


JKS

1D
-3.67%
1M
-17.98%
YTD
-27.32%
6M
-30.75%
1Y
-1.09%
3Y*
-18.80%
5Y*
-9.85%
10Y*
1.19%

GSM

1D
-0.54%
1M
-13.42%
YTD
-19.63%
6M
-21.66%
1Y
3.10%
3Y*
-8.55%
5Y*
-9.33%
10Y*
-7.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JKS vs. GSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JKS
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.
-27.32%10.30%-27.15%-5.56%-11.05%-25.72%175.10%127.40%-58.88%57.91%
GSM
Ferroglobe PLC
-19.63%23.75%-40.95%69.09%-38.00%278.66%74.47%-40.88%-90.06%49.58%

Correlation

The correlation between JKS and GSM is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2010

0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap

JKS:

$226.63M

GSM:

$696.66M

EPS

JKS:

-CN¥272.31

GSM:

-$0.59

PS Ratio

JKS:

0.02

GSM:

0.51

PB Ratio

JKS:

0.10

GSM:

1.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

JKS:

CN¥63.49B

GSM:

$1.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

JKS:

CN¥2.78B

GSM:

$38.19M

EBITDA (TTM)

JKS:

-CN¥5.29B

GSM:

-$97.86M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JKS vs. GSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JKS
JKS Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
JKS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JKS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
JKS Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
JKS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
JKS Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

GSM
GSM Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSM Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSM Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JKS vs. GSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. (JKS) and Ferroglobe PLC (GSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JKSGSMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.06

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

0.09

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.07

0.18

-0.25

JKS vs. GSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JKS Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the GSM Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JKS and GSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JKS vs. GSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JKS drawdown since its inception was -94.84%, roughly equal to the maximum GSM drawdown of -98.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JKS and GSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JKSGSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.84%

-98.30%

+3.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.90%

-33.09%

-9.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.85%

-53.69%

-12.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.24%

-67.30%

-11.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.09%

-97.84%

+15.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-74.25%

-82.40%

+8.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.93%

-55.00%

+3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.60%

17.28%

-0.68%

Volatility

JKS vs. GSM - Volatility Comparison

JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. (JKS) has a higher volatility of 18.45% compared to Ferroglobe PLC (GSM) at 14.47%. This indicates that JKS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JKSGSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.45%

14.47%

+3.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.99%

40.10%

+3.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.00%

56.37%

+5.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.42%

57.00%

+13.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.95%

74.61%

-3.66%

Dividends

JKS vs. GSM - Dividend Comparison

JKS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.18%, more than GSM's 1.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSM
Ferroglobe PLC
1.57%1.21%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.55%0.00%2.95%2.98%
JKS
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.
16.18%5.04%6.02%4.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

JKS vs. GSM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. and Ferroglobe PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
12.25B
347.75M
(JKS) Total Revenue
(GSM) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. JKS values in CNY, GSM values in USD

JKS vs. GSM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. and Ferroglobe PLC over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
8.3%
12.5%
Portfolio components
JKS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.02B and revenue of 12.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.3%.

GSM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ferroglobe PLC reported a gross profit of 43.52M and revenue of 347.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.5%.

JKS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. reported an operating income of -256.25M and revenue of 12.25B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.1%.

GSM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ferroglobe PLC reported an operating income of -28.21M and revenue of 347.75M, resulting in an operating margin of -8.1%.

JKS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. reported a net income of -463.51M and revenue of 12.25B, resulting in a net margin of -3.8%.

GSM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ferroglobe PLC reported a net income of -7.05M and revenue of 347.75M, resulting in a net margin of -2.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


JKS and GSM have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JKS has higher volatility (18.45%) compared to GSM (14.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JKS dropped -94.84% vs GSM's -98.30%.

GSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.06 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JKS and GSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer