JKS vs. GSM
Compare and contrast key facts about JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. (JKS) and Ferroglobe PLC (GSM).
Performance
JKS vs. GSM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JKS vs. GSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JKS JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. | -1.47% | 10.30% | -27.15% | -5.56% | -11.05% | -25.72% | 175.10% | 127.40% | -58.88% | 57.91% |
GSM Ferroglobe PLC | -13.88% | 23.75% | -40.95% | 69.09% | -38.00% | 278.66% | 74.47% | -40.88% | -90.06% | 49.58% |
Fundamentals
JKS:
$332.86M
GSM:
$749.68M
JKS:
-$192.74
GSM:
-$0.91
JKS:
0.00
GSM:
0.56
JKS:
0.02
GSM:
1.08
JKS:
$75.16B
GSM:
$1.34B
JKS:
$5.47B
GSM:
$45.99M
JKS:
-$3.84B
GSM:
-$113.85M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JKS achieves a -1.47% return, which is significantly higher than GSM's -13.88% return. Over the past 10 years, JKS has outperformed GSM with an annualized return of 4.23%, while GSM has yielded a comparatively lower -7.09% annualized return.
JKS
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- -1.47%
- 6M
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- 46.19%
- 3Y*
- -15.70%
- 5Y*
- -6.40%
- 10Y*
- 4.23%
GSM
- 1D
- -3.40%
- 1M
- -23.45%
- YTD
- -13.88%
- 6M
- -11.13%
- 1Y
- 9.38%
- 3Y*
- -6.05%
- 5Y*
- 0.99%
- 10Y*
- -7.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JKS vs. GSM — Risk / Return Rank
JKS
GSM
JKS vs. GSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. (JKS) and Ferroglobe PLC (GSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JKS | GSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 0.17 | +0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.43 | 0.66 | +0.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.07 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 0.27 | +1.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.09 | 0.65 | +3.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JKS | GSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 0.17 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | 0.02 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 | -0.10 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | -0.04 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between JKS and GSM is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
JKS vs. GSM - Dividend Comparison
JKS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, more than GSM's 1.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JKS JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. | 5.11% | 5.04% | 6.02% | 4.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GSM Ferroglobe PLC | 1.43% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.55% | 0.00% | 2.95% | 2.98% |
Drawdowns
JKS vs. GSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JKS drawdown since its inception was -94.84%, roughly equal to the maximum GSM drawdown of -98.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JKS and GSM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JKS | GSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.84% | -98.30% | +3.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.26% | -33.09% | +7.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.24% | -67.30% | -11.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.09% | -97.84% | +15.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.09% | -81.15% | +16.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.70% | -54.68% | +2.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.05% | 13.54% | -2.49% |
Volatility
JKS vs. GSM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. (JKS) is 14.26%, while Ferroglobe PLC (GSM) has a volatility of 17.54%. This indicates that JKS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JKS | GSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.26% | 17.54% | -3.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.75% | 41.51% | +4.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.63% | 54.78% | +5.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.64% | 57.95% | +12.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.52% | 74.45% | -3.93% |
Financials
JKS vs. GSM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. and Ferroglobe PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
JKS vs. GSM - Profitability Comparison
JKS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.18B and revenue of 16.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.3%.
GSM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ferroglobe PLC reported a gross profit of -94.35M and revenue of 329.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -28.6%.
JKS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. reported an operating income of -1.40B and revenue of 16.16B, resulting in an operating margin of -8.7%.
GSM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ferroglobe PLC reported an operating income of -149.87M and revenue of 329.38M, resulting in an operating margin of -45.5%.
JKS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. reported a net income of -749.79M and revenue of 16.16B, resulting in a net margin of -4.6%.
GSM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ferroglobe PLC reported a net income of -80.96M and revenue of 329.38M, resulting in a net margin of -24.6%.