JHMM vs. RFV
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV).
JHMM and RFV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JHMM is a passively managed fund by Manulife that tracks the performance of the John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index. It was launched on Sep 28, 2015. RFV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006. Both JHMM and RFV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: JHMM or RFV.
Key characteristics
| JHMM | RFV | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.57% | -3.04% |
| 1Y Return | 19.13% | 25.21% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 2.70% | 8.17% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.53% | 12.13% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.25 | 1.12 |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.30% | 20.20% |
| Max Drawdown | -40.71% | -71.82% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.95% | -5.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHMM and RFV is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
JHMM vs. RFV - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, JHMM achieves a 3.57% return, which is significantly higher than RFV's -3.04% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JHMM vs. RFV - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHMM has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than RFV's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
JHMM vs. RFV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
JHMM vs. RFV - Dividend Comparison
JHMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than RFV's 1.28% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 1.13% | 1.17% | 1.16% | 0.72% | 1.04% | 1.02% | 1.36% | 0.90% | 1.15% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF | 1.28% | 1.27% | 2.05% | 1.60% | 1.52% | 1.71% | 1.39% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 1.79% | 1.19% | 0.80% |
Drawdowns
JHMM vs. RFV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHMM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, smaller than the maximum RFV drawdown of -71.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMM and RFV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
JHMM vs. RFV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) is 4.03%, while Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that JHMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.