PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JEPI vs. RYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JEPI vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JEPI achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly lower than RYLD's 8.33% return.


JEPI

1D
0.14%
1M
-1.54%
YTD
0.15%
6M
0.47%
1Y
7.70%
3Y*
8.88%
5Y*
7.26%
10Y*

RYLD

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.78%
YTD
8.33%
6M
9.14%
1Y
21.47%
3Y*
7.45%
5Y*
2.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JEPI vs. RYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JEPI
JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF
0.15%8.09%12.57%9.83%-3.49%21.52%18.61%
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
8.33%5.65%10.13%0.27%-13.03%22.13%27.03%

Correlation

The correlation between JEPI and RYLD is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2020

0.65

The correlation between JEPI and RYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

JEPI vs. RYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JEPI
RYLD

Technology

19.1%
16.8%

Healthcare

14.1%
16.5%

Industrials

13.8%
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.7%
8.4%

Financial Services

9.8%
104.9%

Consumer Defensive

9.6%
2.4%

Communication Services

6.9%
2.5%

Utilities

6.2%
2.9%

Real Estate

3.5%
6.2%

Energy

3.5%
6.2%

Basic Materials

1.9%
4.8%

Technology

JEPI
19.1%
RYLD
16.8%

Healthcare

JEPI
14.1%
RYLD
16.5%

Industrials

JEPI
13.8%
RYLD
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

JEPI
11.7%
RYLD
8.4%

Financial Services

JEPI
9.8%
RYLD
104.9%

Consumer Defensive

JEPI
9.6%
RYLD
2.4%

Communication Services

JEPI
6.9%
RYLD
2.5%

Utilities

JEPI
6.2%
RYLD
2.9%

Real Estate

JEPI
3.5%
RYLD
6.2%

Energy

JEPI
3.5%
RYLD
6.2%

Basic Materials

JEPI
1.9%
RYLD
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JEPI vs. RYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JEPI
JEPI Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
JEPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEPI Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
JEPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEPI Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

RYLD
RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JEPI vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JEPIRYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.42

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

3.43

-2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.73

13.86

-10.13

JEPI vs. RYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEPI Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the RYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEPI and RYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JEPIRYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

2.03

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.19

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.32

+0.69

Drawdowns

JEPI vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEPI drawdown since its inception was -13.71%, smaller than the maximum RYLD drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEPI and RYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JEPIRYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.71%

-41.53%

+27.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.68%

-6.29%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.26%

-19.05%

+5.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.71%

-21.33%

+7.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.83%

-0.19%

-4.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.12%

-8.84%

+6.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

1.55%

+0.52%

Volatility

JEPI vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI) is 1.35%, while Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) has a volatility of 2.02%. This indicates that JEPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JEPIRYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

2.02%

-0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.07%

7.60%

-1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.85%

10.67%

-2.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.06%

14.03%

-2.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.80%

17.20%

-6.40%

JEPI vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEPI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

JEPI vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison

JEPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.27%, less than RYLD's 11.65% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
JEPI
JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF
8.27%8.25%7.33%8.40%11.68%6.59%5.79%0.00%
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
11.65%12.00%12.03%12.64%13.49%12.35%10.76%6.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


JEPI and RYLD have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYLD has higher volatility (2.02%) compared to JEPI (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEPI dropped -13.71% vs RYLD's -41.53%.

On 5-year performance, JEPI leads with 7.26% vs 2.69% for RYLD. On fees, JEPI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JEPI has been the lower-risk option at 1.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JEPI has performed better with a 7.26% return vs 2.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JEPI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for RYLD.

RYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.65%, compared with 8.27% for JEPI.

JEPI is categorized as Dividend, while RYLD is Hedge Fund. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JEPI and 0.60% for RYLD.

RYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JEPI and RYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer