JCPB vs. BOND
JCPB (JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF) and BOND (PIMCO Active Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, JCPB returned 1.11%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for BOND. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JCPB charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for BOND.
Performance
JCPB vs. BOND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JCPB achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly higher than BOND's 0.48% return.
JCPB
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 6.11%
- 3Y*
- 5.02%
- 5Y*
- 1.11%
- 10Y*
- —
BOND
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 0.46%
- 1Y
- 6.71%
- 3Y*
- 4.99%
- 5Y*
- 0.51%
- 10Y*
- 2.16%
JCPB vs. BOND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCPB JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.58% | 7.98% | 2.96% | 7.13% | -12.90% | -0.51% | 9.19% | 7.76% |
BOND PIMCO Active Bond ETF | 0.48% | 8.39% | 2.77% | 6.48% | -14.57% | -0.77% | 7.80% | 7.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between JCPB and BOND is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2019 | 0.83 |
The correlation between JCPB and BOND shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (all time) to 0.97 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JCPB vs. BOND - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JCPB
BOND
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Technology
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
JCPB
BOND
-
Financial Services
JCPB
BOND
Technology
JCPB
BOND
-
Real Estate
JCPB
BOND
-
Healthcare
JCPB
BOND
-
Utilities
JCPB
BOND
-
Energy
JCPB
BOND
-
Consumer Cyclical
JCPB
BOND
-
Industrials
JCPB
BOND
-
Consumer Defensive
JCPB
BOND
-
Basic Materials
JCPB
BOND
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JCPB vs. BOND — Risk / Return Rank
JCPB
BOND
JCPB vs. BOND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) and PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JCPB | BOND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.31 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 2.23 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.88 | 7.13 | -0.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JCPB | BOND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 1.70 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.09 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.63 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
JCPB vs. BOND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JCPB drawdown since its inception was -16.67%, smaller than the maximum BOND drawdown of -19.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCPB and BOND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JCPB | BOND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.67% | -19.71% | +3.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.71% | -3.01% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.97% | -6.12% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.67% | -19.71% | +3.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.48% | -1.57% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.26% | -3.50% | -0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.89% | 0.94% | -0.05% |
Volatility
JCPB vs. BOND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) is 1.26%, while PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND) has a volatility of 1.40%. This indicates that JCPB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JCPB | BOND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.26% | 1.40% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.72% | 2.88% | -0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.77% | 3.97% | -0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.38% | 5.76% | -0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.05% | 5.09% | -0.04% |
JCPB vs. BOND - Expense Ratio Comparison
JCPB has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than BOND's 0.54% expense ratio.
Dividends
JCPB vs. BOND - Dividend Comparison
JCPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, less than BOND's 5.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOND PIMCO Active Bond ETF | 5.19% | 5.11% | 5.02% | 4.06% | 3.44% | 2.58% | 2.66% | 3.38% | 3.18% | 2.87% | 2.85% | 4.14% |
JCPB JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF | 4.93% | 4.90% | 5.16% | 4.32% | 3.01% | 2.19% | 2.97% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, JCPB and BOND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BOND has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to JCPB (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCPB dropped -16.67% vs BOND's -19.71%.
On 5-year performance, JCPB leads with 1.11% vs 0.51% for BOND. On fees, JCPB is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, JCPB has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JCPB has performed better with a 1.11% return vs 0.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JCPB is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for BOND.
BOND has the higher dividend yield at 5.19%, compared with 4.93% for JCPB.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for JCPB and 0.54% for BOND.
BOND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JCPB and BOND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer