JCI vs. TT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Johnson Controls International plc (JCI) and Trane Technologies plc (TT).

Performance

JCI vs. TT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Johnson Controls International plc (JCI) and Trane Technologies plc (TT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

JCI vs. TT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JCI Johnson Controls International plc	9.69%	54.03%	39.80%	-7.63%	-19.29%	77.42%	17.70%	40.91%	-19.85%	-5.11%
TT Trane Technologies plc	7.33%	6.38%	52.97%	47.39%	-15.34%	41.02%	11.26%	48.32%	4.41%	21.27%

Fundamentals

Market Cap JCI : $82.94B TT : $93.18B
EPS JCI : $5.29 TT : $13.01
PE Ratio JCI : 24.73 TT : 32.04
PEG Ratio JCI : 4.92 TT : 1.46
PS Ratio JCI : 3.50 TT : 4.39
PB Ratio JCI : 6.28 TT : 10.83
Total Revenue (TTM) JCI : $23.97B TT : $21.32B
Gross Profit (TTM) JCI : $8.74B TT : $7.71B
EBITDA (TTM) JCI : $3.44B TT : $4.21B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JCI achieves a 9.69% return, which is significantly higher than TT's 7.33% return. Over the past 10 years, JCI has underperformed TT with an annualized return of 15.78%, while TT has yielded a comparatively higher 22.93% annualized return.

JCI

• 1D: 3.45%
• 1M: -8.97%
• YTD: 9.69%
• 6M: 19.87%
• 1Y: 65.72%
• 3Y*: 32.09%
• 5Y*: 19.33%
• 10Y*: 15.78%

TT

• 1D: 3.17%
• 1M: -9.64%
• YTD: 7.33%
• 6M: -0.77%
• 1Y: 24.83%
• 3Y*: 32.81%
• 5Y*: 21.85%
• 10Y*: 22.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

JCI vs. TT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JCI

JCI Risk / Return Rank: 92
JCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
JCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
JCI Omega Ratio Rank: 91
JCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
JCI Martin Ratio Rank: 94

TT

TT Risk / Return Rank: 68
TT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
TT Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
TT Omega Ratio Rank: 65
TT Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
TT Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JCI vs. TT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Johnson Controls International plc (JCI) and Trane Technologies plc (TT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JCI	TT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	0.85	+1.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	1.36	+1.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.18	+0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.71	1.34	+3.37
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.27	2.69	+11.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JCI vs. TT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JCI Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the TT Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JCI and TT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JCI	TT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21	0.85	+1.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	0.81	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.82	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.46	-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between JCI and TT is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

JCI vs. TT - Dividend Comparison

JCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, more than TT's 0.93% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JCI Johnson Controls International plc	1.20%	1.29%	1.88%	2.55%	2.19%	1.41%	2.23%	2.55%	3.51%	2.65%	4.23%	5.85%
TT Trane Technologies plc	0.93%	0.97%	0.91%	1.23%	1.59%	1.17%	1.46%	1.59%	2.15%	1.91%	1.81%	2.10%

Drawdowns

JCI vs. TT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JCI drawdown since its inception was -86.83%, which is greater than TT's maximum drawdown of -77.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCI and TT.

Drawdown Indicators

	JCI	TT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.83%	-77.91%	-8.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.14%	-19.97%	+5.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.32%	-40.53%	-1.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.14%	-51.13%	+3.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.70%	-11.60%	+1.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.43%	-14.88%	-9.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.67%	9.92%	-5.25%

Volatility

JCI vs. TT - Volatility Comparison

Johnson Controls International plc (JCI) and Trane Technologies plc (TT) have volatilities of 10.67% and 10.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JCI	TT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.67%	10.97%	-0.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.59%	20.33%	+0.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.88%	29.46%	+0.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.91%	27.00%	+0.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.85%	28.14%	-0.29%

Financials

JCI vs. TT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Johnson Controls International plc and Trane Technologies plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

JCI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Johnson Controls International plc reported a gross profit of 2.07B and revenue of 5.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.8%.

TT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported a gross profit of 1.75B and revenue of 5.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.1%.

JCI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Johnson Controls International plc reported an operating income of 853.00M and revenue of 5.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.7%.

TT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported an operating income of 819.00M and revenue of 5.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.9%.

JCI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Johnson Controls International plc reported a net income of 524.00M and revenue of 5.80B, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.

TT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported a net income of 591.30M and revenue of 5.14B, resulting in a net margin of 11.5%.