JBL vs. TMO

In the year-to-date period, JBL achieves a 2.15% return, which is significantly higher than TMO's -18.38% return. Over the past 10 years, JBL has outperformed TMO with an annualized return of 21.78%, while TMO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.31% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jabil Inc. (JBL) and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current JBL Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is higher than the TMO Sharpe Ratio of -1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JBL and TMO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

JBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than TMO's 0.38% yield.

The maximum JBL drawdown since its inception was -94.92%, which is greater than TMO's maximum drawdown of -71.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBL and TMO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Jabil Inc. (JBL) has a higher volatility of 22.04% compared to Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO) at 15.01%. This indicates that JBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Jabil Inc. and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.