PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JBHT vs. J
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

JBHT vs. J - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT) and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (J). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JBHT achieves a 41.27% return, which is significantly higher than J's -9.87% return. Over the past 10 years, JBHT has outperformed J with an annualized return of 14.38%, while J has yielded a comparatively lower 12.23% annualized return.


JBHT

1D
0.83%
1M
5.68%
YTD
41.27%
6M
37.56%
1Y
97.75%
3Y*
17.14%
5Y*
12.46%
10Y*
14.38%

J

1D
-1.88%
1M
3.50%
YTD
-9.87%
6M
-12.01%
1Y
-5.81%
3Y*
9.18%
5Y*
2.78%
10Y*
12.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JBHT vs. J - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JBHT
J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
41.27%15.20%-13.75%15.59%-13.92%50.64%18.11%26.77%-18.41%19.60%
J
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
-9.87%2.13%24.23%9.02%-13.12%28.60%22.36%54.99%-10.58%16.98%

Correlation

The correlation between JBHT and J is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.33

The correlation between JBHT and J shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (all time) to 0.45 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

JBHT:

$6.41

J:

$2.83

PE Ratio

JBHT:

42.68

J:

41.93

PS Ratio

JBHT:

2.19

J:

0.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

JBHT:

$12.13B

J:

$13.17B

Gross Profit (TTM)

JBHT:

$2.10B

J:

$3.08B

EBITDA (TTM)

JBHT:

$1.57B

J:

$845.72M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JBHT vs. J — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JBHT
JBHT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
JBHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBHT Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
JBHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBHT Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

J
J Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
J Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
J Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
J Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
J Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
J Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JBHT vs. J - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT) and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (J). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JBHTJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.00

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.19

-0.17

+6.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.17

-0.37

+16.53

JBHT vs. J - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JBHT Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the J Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JBHT and J, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JBHT vs. J - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JBHT drawdown since its inception was -71.55%, roughly equal to the maximum J drawdown of -74.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBHT and J.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JBHTJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.55%

-74.14%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.87%

-34.44%

+18.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.41%

-34.44%

-7.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.41%

-34.44%

-7.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.41%

-39.33%

-3.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.49%

-27.22%

+21.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.54%

-26.17%

+7.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.07%

15.89%

-9.82%

Volatility

JBHT vs. J - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT) is 8.52%, while Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (J) has a volatility of 9.15%. This indicates that JBHT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than J based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JBHTJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.52%

9.15%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.11%

25.65%

-2.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.16%

32.01%

+6.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.09%

26.17%

+5.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.94%

27.87%

+2.07%

Dividends

JBHT vs. J - Dividend Comparison

JBHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than J's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
J
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
1.15%1.96%0.76%0.80%0.77%0.60%0.70%0.76%1.03%0.91%0.00%0.00%
JBHT
J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
0.65%0.91%1.01%0.84%0.92%0.58%0.79%0.89%1.03%0.80%0.91%1.15%

Financials

JBHT vs. J - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-1.00B0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
3.06B
3.69B
(JBHT) Total Revenue
(J) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

JBHT vs. J - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
28.3%
21.5%
Portfolio components
JBHT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 866.00M and revenue of 3.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.3%.

J - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 794.89M and revenue of 3.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.5%.

JBHT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 207.05M and revenue of 3.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.

J - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. reported an operating income of -81.18M and revenue of 3.69B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.2%.

JBHT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. reported a net income of 141.55M and revenue of 3.06B, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.

J - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. reported a net income of -175.69M and revenue of 3.69B, resulting in a net margin of -4.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


JBHT and J have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

J has higher volatility (9.15%) compared to JBHT (8.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JBHT dropped -71.55% vs J's -74.14%.

JBHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JBHT and J

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer