PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
JBGS vs. SPY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between JBGS and SPY is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

JBGS vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-13.22%
7.41%
JBGS
SPY

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

JBGS:

-0.06

SPY:

1.75

Sortino Ratio

JBGS:

0.11

SPY:

2.36

Omega Ratio

JBGS:

1.01

SPY:

1.32

Calmar Ratio

JBGS:

-0.03

SPY:

2.66

Martin Ratio

JBGS:

-0.15

SPY:

11.01

Ulcer Index

JBGS:

11.46%

SPY:

2.03%

Daily Std Dev

JBGS:

27.97%

SPY:

12.77%

Max Drawdown

JBGS:

-65.39%

SPY:

-55.19%

Current Drawdown

JBGS:

-56.71%

SPY:

-2.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JBGS achieves a -2.93% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 2.36% return.


JBGS

YTD

-2.93%

1M

-2.93%

6M

-13.22%

1Y

-4.21%

5Y*

-15.26%

10Y*

N/A

SPY

YTD

2.36%

1M

-1.07%

6M

7.41%

1Y

19.73%

5Y*

14.21%

10Y*

12.96%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

JBGS vs. SPY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JBGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of JBGS is 4040
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of JBGS is 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of JBGS is 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of JBGS is 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of JBGS is 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of JBGS is 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SPY is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SPY is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SPY is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SPY is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SPY is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SPY is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

JBGS vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for JBGS, currently valued at -0.06, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.00-0.061.75
The chart of Sortino ratio for JBGS, currently valued at 0.10, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.112.36
The chart of Omega ratio for JBGS, currently valued at 1.01, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.011.32
The chart of Calmar ratio for JBGS, currently valued at -0.03, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.032.66
The chart of Martin ratio for JBGS, currently valued at -0.15, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.1511.01
JBGS
SPY

The current JBGS Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JBGS and SPY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.06
1.75
JBGS
SPY

Dividends

JBGS vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

JBGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, more than SPY's 1.18% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
JBGS
JBG SMITH Properties
5.86%5.69%3.97%4.74%3.13%2.88%2.26%2.87%1.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY
SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.18%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%1.87%

Drawdowns

JBGS vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JBGS drawdown since its inception was -65.39%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBGS and SPY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-56.71%
-2.12%
JBGS
SPY

Volatility

JBGS vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) has a higher volatility of 9.50% compared to SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 3.38%. This indicates that JBGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
9.50%
3.38%
JBGS
SPY
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab