JBGS vs. SPY
JBGS (JBG SMITH Properties) is a stock, while SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 5 years, JBGS returned -10.89%/yr vs 13.02%/yr for SPY. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
JBGS vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JBGS achieves a -11.46% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 9.58% return.
JBGS
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 7.13%
- 6M
- -14.52%
- YTD
- -11.46%
- 1Y
- -14.67%
- 3Y*
- 1.96%
- 5Y*
- -10.89%
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- YTD
- 9.58%
- 1Y
- 19.66%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 13.02%
- 10Y*
- 14.97%
JBGS vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JBGS JBG SMITH Properties | -11.46% | 15.18% | -4.51% | -6.13% | -31.04% | -5.42% | -19.22% | 17.23% | 3.03% | -3.79% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9.58% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 9.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between JBGS and SPY is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2017 | 0.44 |
Over the past year, the correlation between JBGS and SPY has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JBGS vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
JBGS
SPY
JBGS vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JBGS | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.28 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.36 | 2.22 | -2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.52 | 9.66 | -10.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JBGS vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JBGS drawdown since its inception was -65.38%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBGS and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JBGS | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.38% | -55.19% | -10.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.82% | -8.88% | -31.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.82% | -18.76% | -22.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.29% | -24.50% | -33.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.52% | -1.89% | -52.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.52% | -9.02% | -23.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.38% | 2.04% | +26.34% |
Volatility
JBGS vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) has a higher volatility of 8.70% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 3.67%. This indicates that JBGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JBGS | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.70% | 3.67% | +5.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.94% | 10.06% | +10.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.34% | 12.63% | +17.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.56% | 17.17% | +14.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.28% | 17.93% | +13.35% |
Dividends
JBGS vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
JBGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than SPY's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JBGS JBG SMITH Properties | 4.70% | 4.12% | 5.69% | 3.97% | 4.74% | 3.13% | 2.88% | 2.26% | 2.87% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JBGS and SPY have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JBGS has higher volatility (8.70%) compared to SPY (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JBGS dropped -65.38% vs SPY's -55.19%.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JBGS and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer