PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JAGX vs. FSHCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JAGX vs. FSHCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jaguar Health, Inc. (JAGX) and Fidelity Select Health Care Services Portfolio (FSHCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAGX achieves a -89.16% return, which is significantly lower than FSHCX's 1.77% return. Over the past 10 years, JAGX has underperformed FSHCX with an annualized return of -89.20%, while FSHCX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.22% annualized return.


JAGX

1D
-9.32%
1M
-10.15%
YTD
-89.16%
6M
-90.10%
1Y
-97.58%
3Y*
-95.16%
5Y*
-95.58%
10Y*
-89.20%

FSHCX

1D
-0.91%
1M
-0.80%
YTD
1.77%
6M
2.10%
1Y
5.67%
3Y*
-1.01%
5Y*
-0.25%
10Y*
8.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JAGX vs. FSHCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JAGX
Jaguar Health, Inc.
-89.16%-96.31%-88.88%-97.68%-91.64%-57.46%1.75%-95.00%-89.10%-80.45%
FSHCX
Fidelity Select Health Care Services Portfolio
1.77%3.85%-13.21%1.52%0.86%20.22%18.58%19.91%10.17%24.46%

Correlation

The correlation between JAGX and FSHCX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2015

0.12

The correlation between JAGX and FSHCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (3 years) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JAGX vs. FSHCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JAGX
JAGX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
JAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
JAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

FSHCX
FSHCX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FSHCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSHCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSHCX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FSHCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSHCX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JAGX vs. FSHCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jaguar Health, Inc. (JAGX) and Fidelity Select Health Care Services Portfolio (FSHCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JAGXFSHCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.63

0.26

-0.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-2.35

0.47

-2.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.70

1.07

-0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

0.31

-1.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.41

0.79

-2.20

JAGX vs. FSHCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAGX Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the FSHCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAGX and FSHCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JAGXFSHCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.63

0.26

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.69

-0.01

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.51

0.38

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.52

0.54

-1.06

Drawdowns

JAGX vs. FSHCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAGX drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than FSHCX's maximum drawdown of -57.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAGX and FSHCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JAGXFSHCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-57.81%

-42.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-97.60%

-17.15%

-80.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.99%

-29.52%

-70.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-100.00%

-29.52%

-70.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-100.00%

-35.48%

-64.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-12.91%

-87.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-94.08%

-11.37%

-82.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

69.57%

6.75%

+62.82%

Volatility

JAGX vs. FSHCX - Volatility Comparison

Jaguar Health, Inc. (JAGX) has a higher volatility of 37.56% compared to Fidelity Select Health Care Services Portfolio (FSHCX) at 4.66%. This indicates that JAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSHCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JAGXFSHCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.56%

4.66%

+32.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

141.80%

15.20%

+126.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

153.89%

20.34%

+133.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

137.92%

19.17%

+118.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

173.43%

21.47%

+151.96%

Dividends

JAGX vs. FSHCX - Dividend Comparison

JAGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSHCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSHCX
Fidelity Select Health Care Services Portfolio
0.74%0.75%16.63%0.57%5.32%7.09%0.76%0.27%12.92%13.41%4.62%4.06%
JAGX
Jaguar Health, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JAGX and FSHCX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JAGX has higher volatility (37.56%) compared to FSHCX (4.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAGX dropped -100.00% vs FSHCX's -57.81%.

FSHCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JAGX and FSHCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer