JACK vs. LU

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

JACK (Jack in the Box Inc.) and LU (Lufax Holding Ltd) are both stocks. JACK operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while LU operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, JACK returned -34.06%/yr vs -38.63%/yr for LU. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

JACK vs. LU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) and Lufax Holding Ltd (LU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JACK achieves a -32.72% return, which is significantly higher than LU's -36.72% return.

JACK

• 1D: -5.42%
• 1M: 3.83%
• YTD: -32.72%
• 6M: -34.38%
• 1Y: -31.78%
• 3Y*: -46.81%
• 5Y*: -34.06%
• 10Y*: -15.85%

LU

• 1D: -2.41%
• 1M: -16.92%
• YTD: -36.72%
• 6M: -36.72%
• 1Y: -43.94%
• 3Y*: -12.93%
• 5Y*: -38.63%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JACK vs. LU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
JACK Jack in the Box Inc.	-32.72%	-53.84%	-47.35%	22.24%	-20.18%	-4.11%	16.42%
LU Lufax Holding Ltd	-36.72%	7.11%	73.97%	-58.03%	-60.48%	-60.35%	10.51%

Correlation

The correlation between JACK and LU is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2020	0.13

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) JACK : $659.18M LU : $31.92B
Gross Profit (TTM) JACK : $181.29M LU : $13.50B
EBITDA (TTM) JACK : $173.13M LU : -$1.26B

Return for Risk

JACK vs. LU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JACK

JACK Risk / Return Rank: 22
JACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
JACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
JACK Omega Ratio Rank: 25
JACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
JACK Martin Ratio Rank: 19

LU

LU Risk / Return Rank: 10
LU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
LU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
LU Omega Ratio Rank: 10
LU Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
LU Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JACK vs. LU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) and Lufax Holding Ltd (LU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JACK	LU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.45	-0.84	+0.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.25	-1.23	+0.98
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	0.86	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.53	-0.70	+0.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.01	-1.21	+0.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JACK vs. LU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JACK Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is higher than the LU Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JACK and LU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JACK	LU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.45	-0.84	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.71	-0.51	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	-0.47	+0.52

Drawdowns

JACK vs. LU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JACK drawdown since its inception was -91.50%, smaller than the maximum LU drawdown of -96.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JACK and LU.

Drawdown Indicators

	JACK	LU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.50%	-96.68%	+5.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-62.24%	-63.64%	+1.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-90.00%	-69.41%	-20.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-91.46%	-94.84%	+3.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-91.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-88.47%	-94.42%	+5.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.25%	-78.35%	+48.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.43%	36.89%	-4.46%

Volatility

JACK vs. LU - Volatility Comparison

Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) has a higher volatility of 26.27% compared to Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) at 10.94%. This indicates that JACK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JACK	LU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.27%	10.94%	+15.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.12%	33.56%	+17.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.66%	52.39%	+19.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	48.28%	76.54%	-28.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.61%	76.27%	-29.66%

Dividends

JACK vs. LU - Dividend Comparison

Neither JACK nor LU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JACK Jack in the Box Inc.	0.00%	2.32%	4.23%	2.16%	2.58%	1.97%	1.29%	2.05%	2.06%	1.63%	1.16%	1.43%
LU Lufax Holding Ltd	0.00%	0.00%	101.26%	11.60%	26.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JACK and LU in my portfolio?

JACK and LU have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JACK or LU?

JACK has higher volatility (26.27%) compared to LU (10.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JACK dropped -91.50% vs LU's -96.68%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JACK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.45 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.