JACK vs. LU
Compare and contrast key facts about Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) and Lufax Holding Ltd (LU).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: JACK or LU.
Key characteristics
| JACK | LU | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -31.91% | 43.32% |
| 1Y Return | -39.55% | -30.10% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -21.28% | -51.83% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -1.34 | -0.37 |
| Daily Std Dev | 29.75% | 86.60% |
| Max Drawdown | -82.47% | -96.70% |
| Current Drawdown | -51.96% | -93.24% |
Fundamentals
| JACK | LU | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.15B | $5.36B |
| EPS | $6.30 | -$0.16 |
| PE Ratio | 9.33 | 19.73 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.65B | $38.57B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $433.01M | $51.69B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $315.24M | $14.24B |
Correlation
The correlation between JACK and LU is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
JACK vs. LU - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, JACK achieves a -31.91% return, which is significantly lower than LU's 43.32% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
JACK vs. LU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) and Lufax Holding Ltd (LU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
JACK vs. LU - Dividend Comparison
JACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than LU's 3.55% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JACK Jack in the Box Inc. | 3.19% | 2.16% | 2.58% | 1.97% | 1.29% | 2.05% | 2.06% | 1.63% | 1.16% | 1.43% | 0.75% |
LU Lufax Holding Ltd | 3.55% | 11.60% | 25.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
JACK vs. LU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JACK drawdown since its inception was -82.47%, smaller than the maximum LU drawdown of -96.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JACK and LU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
JACK vs. LU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) is 7.56%, while Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) has a volatility of 11.09%. This indicates that JACK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
JACK vs. LU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Jack in the Box Inc. and Lufax Holding Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities