JABLX vs. BABA
JABLX (Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio) is Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Janus Henderson, while BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Limited) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, JABLX returned 10.75%/yr vs 3.64%/yr for BABA. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
JABLX vs. BABA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JABLX achieves a 3.48% return, which is significantly higher than BABA's -29.36% return. Over the past 10 years, JABLX has outperformed BABA with an annualized return of 10.75%, while BABA has yielded a comparatively lower 3.64% annualized return.
JABLX
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 3.48%
- 6M
- 3.00%
- 1Y
- 13.72%
- 3Y*
- 13.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.70%
- 10Y*
- 10.75%
BABA
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- -20.35%
- YTD
- -29.36%
- 6M
- -31.53%
- 1Y
- -8.44%
- 3Y*
- 8.69%
- 5Y*
- -12.97%
- 10Y*
- 3.64%
JABLX vs. BABA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JABLX Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio | 3.48% | 15.13% | 15.42% | 15.41% | -16.36% | 17.20% | 14.21% | 22.60% | 0.68% | 18.44% |
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | -29.36% | 75.80% | 11.77% | -10.83% | -25.84% | -48.96% | 9.73% | 54.74% | -20.51% | 96.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between JABLX and BABA is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2014 | 0.42 |
The correlation between JABLX and BABA shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (3 years) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JABLX vs. BABA — Risk / Return Rank
JABLX
BABA
JABLX vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (JABLX) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JABLX | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.00 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | -0.19 | +1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.60 | -0.41 | +8.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JABLX vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JABLX drawdown since its inception was -27.07%, smaller than the maximum BABA drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JABLX and BABA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JABLX | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.07% | -80.09% | +53.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.10% | -45.31% | +37.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.89% | -45.31% | +33.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.30% | -72.48% | +51.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.47% | -80.09% | +57.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -65.62% | +65.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.71% | -37.61% | +32.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 20.66% | -18.77% |
Volatility
JABLX vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (JABLX) is 3.51%, while Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) has a volatility of 8.04%. This indicates that JABLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JABLX | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.51% | 8.04% | -4.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.54% | 29.29% | -21.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.23% | 43.82% | -34.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.24% | 51.46% | -40.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.16% | 43.41% | -32.25% |
Dividends
JABLX vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison
JABLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.70%, more than BABA's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 1.02% | 1.36% | 1.96% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JABLX Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio | 10.70% | 5.16% | 2.02% | 2.01% | 4.78% | 1.58% | 3.14% | 4.43% | 5.22% | 1.71% | 3.64% | 5.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JABLX and BABA have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BABA has higher volatility (8.04%) compared to JABLX (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JABLX dropped -27.07% vs BABA's -80.09%.
JABLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JABLX and BABA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer