PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JABLX vs. BABA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JABLX vs. BABA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (JABLX) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JABLX achieves a 3.48% return, which is significantly higher than BABA's -29.36% return. Over the past 10 years, JABLX has outperformed BABA with an annualized return of 10.75%, while BABA has yielded a comparatively lower 3.64% annualized return.


JABLX

1D
-0.42%
1M
1.06%
YTD
3.48%
6M
3.00%
1Y
13.72%
3Y*
13.78%
5Y*
7.70%
10Y*
10.75%

BABA

1D
-2.26%
1M
-20.35%
YTD
-29.36%
6M
-31.53%
1Y
-8.44%
3Y*
8.69%
5Y*
-12.97%
10Y*
3.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JABLX vs. BABA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JABLX
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
3.48%15.13%15.42%15.41%-16.36%17.20%14.21%22.60%0.68%18.44%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
-29.36%75.80%11.77%-10.83%-25.84%-48.96%9.73%54.74%-20.51%96.37%

Correlation

The correlation between JABLX and BABA is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2014

0.42

The correlation between JABLX and BABA shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (3 years) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JABLX vs. BABA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JABLX
JABLX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
JABLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JABLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
JABLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
JABLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
JABLX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

BABA
BABA Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
BABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
BABA Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
BABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
BABA Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JABLX vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (JABLX) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JABLXBABADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.00

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

-0.19

+1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.60

-0.41

+8.01

JABLX vs. BABA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JABLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the BABA Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JABLX and BABA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JABLX vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JABLX drawdown since its inception was -27.07%, smaller than the maximum BABA drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JABLX and BABA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JABLXBABADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.07%

-80.09%

+53.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.10%

-45.31%

+37.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.89%

-45.31%

+33.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.30%

-72.48%

+51.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.47%

-80.09%

+57.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-65.62%

+65.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.71%

-37.61%

+32.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

20.66%

-18.77%

Volatility

JABLX vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (JABLX) is 3.51%, while Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) has a volatility of 8.04%. This indicates that JABLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JABLXBABADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

8.04%

-4.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.54%

29.29%

-21.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.23%

43.82%

-34.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.24%

51.46%

-40.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.16%

43.41%

-32.25%

Dividends

JABLX vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison

JABLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.70%, more than BABA's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
1.02%1.36%1.96%1.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JABLX
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio
10.70%5.16%2.02%2.01%4.78%1.58%3.14%4.43%5.22%1.71%3.64%5.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


JABLX and BABA have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BABA has higher volatility (8.04%) compared to JABLX (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JABLX dropped -27.07% vs BABA's -80.09%.

JABLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JABLX and BABA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer