JABLX vs. BABA
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (JABLX) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA).
JABLX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Sep 12, 1993.
Performance
JABLX vs. BABA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JABLX vs. BABA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JABLX Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio | -6.82% | 15.13% | 15.42% | 15.41% | -16.36% | 17.20% | 14.21% | 22.60% | 0.68% | 18.44% |
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | -14.41% | 75.80% | 11.77% | -10.83% | -25.84% | -48.96% | 9.73% | 54.74% | -20.51% | 96.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JABLX achieves a -6.82% return, which is significantly higher than BABA's -14.41% return. Over the past 10 years, JABLX has outperformed BABA with an annualized return of 9.40%, while BABA has yielded a comparatively lower 5.31% annualized return.
JABLX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -6.60%
- YTD
- -6.82%
- 6M
- -5.27%
- 1Y
- 9.48%
- 3Y*
- 10.75%
- 5Y*
- 6.63%
- 10Y*
- 9.40%
BABA
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- -12.94%
- YTD
- -14.41%
- 6M
- -29.80%
- 1Y
- -3.52%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- -10.05%
- 10Y*
- 5.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JABLX vs. BABA — Risk / Return Rank
JABLX
BABA
JABLX vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (JABLX) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JABLX | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.82 | -0.08 | +0.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 0.23 | +1.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.03 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | -0.10 | +1.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.28 | -0.24 | +4.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JABLX | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | -0.08 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | -0.20 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | 0.12 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.07 | +0.83 |
Correlation
The correlation between JABLX and BABA is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
JABLX vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison
JABLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%, more than BABA's 1.59% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JABLX Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio | 5.53% | 5.16% | 2.02% | 2.01% | 4.78% | 1.58% | 3.14% | 4.43% | 5.22% | 1.71% | 3.64% | 5.22% |
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 1.59% | 1.36% | 1.96% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
JABLX vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JABLX drawdown since its inception was -27.07%, smaller than the maximum BABA drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JABLX and BABA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JABLX | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.07% | -80.09% | +53.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.10% | -35.58% | +27.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.30% | -74.12% | +52.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.47% | -80.09% | +57.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.10% | -58.34% | +50.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.73% | -37.23% | +32.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 15.43% | -13.43% |
Volatility
JABLX vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (JABLX) is 3.30%, while Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) has a volatility of 12.47%. This indicates that JABLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JABLX | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.30% | 12.47% | -9.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.48% | 29.36% | -22.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.01% | 45.97% | -33.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.11% | 51.12% | -40.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.06% | 43.22% | -32.16% |