PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JAAAX vs. IWP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JAAAX vs. IWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund (JAAAX) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAAAX achieves a 5.59% return, which is significantly higher than IWP's 3.69% return. Over the past 10 years, JAAAX has underperformed IWP with an annualized return of 4.22%, while IWP has yielded a comparatively higher 12.76% annualized return.


JAAAX

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.45%
YTD
5.59%
6M
5.55%
1Y
10.38%
3Y*
6.96%
5Y*
4.41%
10Y*
4.22%

IWP

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.79%
YTD
3.69%
6M
1.21%
1Y
6.05%
3Y*
15.53%
5Y*
5.46%
10Y*
12.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JAAAX vs. IWP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JAAAX
John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund
5.59%6.18%6.59%5.85%-3.12%4.77%4.36%8.95%-4.09%6.10%
IWP
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
3.69%8.45%21.86%25.70%-26.90%12.60%35.25%35.04%-4.89%24.93%

Correlation

The correlation between JAAAX and IWP is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2008

0.77

The correlation between JAAAX and IWP shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JAAAX vs. IWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JAAAX
JAAAX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
JAAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
JAAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

IWP
IWP Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
IWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWP Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
IWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWP Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JAAAX vs. IWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund (JAAAX) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JAAAXIWPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.07

+0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.06

0.41

+4.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.35

1.19

+18.16

JAAAX vs. IWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAAAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is higher than the IWP Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAAAX and IWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JAAAX vs. IWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAAAX drawdown since its inception was -15.72%, smaller than the maximum IWP drawdown of -56.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAAAX and IWP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JAAAXIWPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.72%

-56.92%

+41.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.02%

-14.79%

+12.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.66%

-25.20%

+19.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.28%

-38.62%

+32.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.64%

-38.62%

+25.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-2.16%

+1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.04%

-9.67%

+7.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

5.11%

-4.58%

Volatility

JAAAX vs. IWP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund (JAAAX) is 1.10%, while iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) has a volatility of 5.63%. This indicates that JAAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JAAAXIWPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

5.63%

-4.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.63%

13.32%

-10.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.40%

17.05%

-13.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.22%

22.39%

-18.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.38%

21.73%

-17.35%

JAAAX vs. IWP - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAAAX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than IWP's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

JAAAX vs. IWP - Dividend Comparison

JAAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than IWP's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWP
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.35%0.37%0.40%0.54%0.77%0.30%0.38%0.59%1.02%0.78%1.16%0.98%
JAAAX
John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund
1.45%1.53%1.17%1.71%3.02%1.72%0.74%3.38%1.99%1.23%0.77%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


JAAAX and IWP have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWP has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to JAAAX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAAAX dropped -15.72% vs IWP's -56.92%.

JAAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JAAAX and IWP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer